Difference between revisions of "Translations:UDRP/34/zh"

From ICANNWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== ICA要求調查NAF​​ UDRP裁決== <!--T:34--> 2012年2月,互聯網商業協會(ICA)致信ICANN,要求基於National Arbitration Forum美國國家...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== ICA要求調查NAF​​ UDRP裁決== <!--T:34-->
+
== ICA要求調查NAF​​ UDRP裁決==  
  
 
2012年2月,[[ICA|互聯網商業協會]](ICA)致信ICANN,要求基於[[National Arbitration Forum]]美國國家仲裁論壇(NAF)的最近兩宗裁決,向其UDRP仲裁做法立即作出調查。<ref>[http://internetcommerce.org/NAF_UDRP_FAIL ICANN Should Investigate NAF’s UDRP Practices]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/ica-demands-probe-of-shoddy-udrp-decisions/ ICA demands probe of “shoddy” UDRP decisions]</ref>  
 
2012年2月,[[ICA|互聯網商業協會]](ICA)致信ICANN,要求基於[[National Arbitration Forum]]美國國家仲裁論壇(NAF)的最近兩宗裁決,向其UDRP仲裁做法立即作出調查。<ref>[http://internetcommerce.org/NAF_UDRP_FAIL ICANN Should Investigate NAF’s UDRP Practices]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/ica-demands-probe-of-shoddy-udrp-decisions/ ICA demands probe of “shoddy” UDRP decisions]</ref>  
 
第一宗案例是Hardware Resources, Inc 與 Yaseen Rehman,NAF裁定hardwareresources.org 應轉移至投訴人由於域名與其商標屬混淆性相似,加上被告未能對投訴作出回應。<ref>[http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1423229.htm NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Yaseen Rehman]</ref>
 
第一宗案例是Hardware Resources, Inc 與 Yaseen Rehman,NAF裁定hardwareresources.org 應轉移至投訴人由於域名與其商標屬混淆性相似,加上被告未能對投訴作出回應。<ref>[http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1423229.htm NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM DECISION Hardware Resources, Inc. v. Yaseen Rehman]</ref>

Latest revision as of 19:53, 22 February 2016

ICA要求調查NAF​​ UDRP裁決

2012年2月,互聯網商業協會(ICA)致信ICANN,要求基於National Arbitration Forum美國國家仲裁論壇(NAF)的最近兩宗裁決,向其UDRP仲裁做法立即作出調查。[1] [2] 第一宗案例是Hardware Resources, Inc 與 Yaseen Rehman,NAF裁定hardwareresources.org 應轉移至投訴人由於域名與其商標屬混淆性相似,加上被告未能對投訴作出回應。[3]