Jump to content

Template:Article of the Week 2016/31: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, lookupuser, staff, Administrators, translator
11,770 edits
mNo edit summary
Dustin Loup (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, lookupuser, staff, Administrators, translator
11,770 edits
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''national intranet''' is an IP (Internet Protocol) based self-contained internet under state control. Considered a form of governmental [[Internet Fragmentation]], intranets limit user access to the global internet. This is made possible by blocking certain IP addresses, limiting bandwidth and offering a suite of state-issued search engines and email services.
'''[[Reverse Domain Name Hijacking]]''', also known as Reverse Domain Hijacking or Reverse Cybersquatting, involves attempting to use trademark protection mechanisms, such as [[ICANN]]'s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy ([[UDRP]]) or the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act ([[ACPA]]), in bad faith to acquire a domain name when the owner has legitimate rights to it. Reverse domain name hijacking is usually attempted by large companies that can afford expensive legal fees.
 
An example of this is Iran's National Internet Project, which is set to be completed in 2019. This type of internet, nicknamed "halal internet" will function under Islamic principles, differentiating content based on its "cleanliness". This fundamental approach was most clearly described by Reza Taghipour, minister of information and communications technology (2009-2012) when he stated that "isolation of the clean internet from the unclean portion will make it impossible to use the internet for unethical and dirty businesses”.
 
----
'''Recently Featured:''' [[ICANN Board]] - [[UNCTAD]] - [[NiRA]] - [[Project:Article_of_the_Week_2016|Full Archive]]

Latest revision as of 14:18, 28 July 2016

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, also known as Reverse Domain Hijacking or Reverse Cybersquatting, involves attempting to use trademark protection mechanisms, such as ICANN's Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) or the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (ACPA), in bad faith to acquire a domain name when the owner has legitimate rights to it. Reverse domain name hijacking is usually attempted by large companies that can afford expensive legal fees.

Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/index.php?title=Template:Article_of_the_Week_2016/31&oldid=114962"