User talk:Jean william: Difference between revisions

Line 84:

I'm going to maintain the lock on the .eco page, and this is the last response I'm going to provide here.

:

Once again Greetings to you, Attorney J-P Voillequé,

===I'll reiterate: "ICANN's approval of Big Room as the Registry operator for the .eco TLD" has nothing to do with the issue of "authorized delegation".===

Do not misconstrue the obvious fact that Big Room was approved by the government contractor. That is very obvious.

I hope you, as an attorney working with ISOC, are not trying to suggest "approval" and the CO's authority to delegate Big Room Inc. is the same? If so, I think that's inappropriate.

We are obviously being treated differently, singled out and, in my humble opinion, you are helping to create and perpetuate a very strange and false narrative.

Moving forward, under planet .ECO Trademark Litigation, please correct the following, as the global community should be made aware of the many litigations brought on by Big Room's persistent frivolous filings against us.

'''This fact needs to be clear and transparent''' - When it comes to our trademark ".eco", '''both parties, Big Room Inc. and Doteco (TLDH), co-founded by former ICANN Board Members and Key Executives, were Dismissed With Prejudice'''.

In total there were 6 attempts to cancel, oppose, and/or petition against us, brought by companies founded by former ICANN Board Members and Key Executive.

To reiterate - we do not dispute any fact regarding the government contractor's recommendation to delegate foreign company Big Room Inc., pursuant with Section C.2.9.2d of DoC/NTIA Federal Contract SA1301-CN-12-0035.

'''Without evidence, we dispute Big Room's standing and authorization to provide ".eco" Registry Operator Services, as prescribed in Section G1 - Contracting Officer's Authority.

United States Patent and Trademark Activities and Events are shown below.

1. On July 15, 2008 Big Room Inc. submitted trademark application # 77523010, and was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned by .ECO®.

2. On July 15, 2008 Big Room Inc. submitted trademark application # 77523015, and was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned by .ECO®.

3. On January 8, 2009 Big Room Inc submitted trademark application # 77646029 and was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned by .ECO®.

4. On January 4, 2010 Doteco LLC filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92051924 against .ECO® founder Moses Boone. On January 9, 2012, the litigation was '''Dismissed with Prejudice'''.

5. On February 17, 2012 Big Room Inc filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92055197 against .ECO®. On July 16, 2013, the litigation was Dismissed.

6. On April 12, 2012 Top Level Domain Holdings Inc. (TLDH), founded and operated by former ICANN Chair, Board Members and Key Executives, filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92055469 against .ECO®. On November 2, 2012, the litigation was Dismissed.

7. On November 20, 2014 Big Room Inc filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92060403 against .ECO®. On May 28, 2015, the litigation was Dismissed.

8. On May 29, 2015 USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92060403 was cured by Big Room Inc. and on July 17, 2015 again, Dismissed.

9. On 8/28/2016, Big Room was designated the registry operator of the .ECO gTLD and 006Fn September 9, 2016 Big Room Inc filed and was granted a 90 Day Extension of time to investigate and Oppose .ECO® “.eco” application serial # 86846214. On December 14, 2016 Big Room Inc followed up by filing USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 91231750 against .ECO®. On May 7, 2019, the trademark proceeding was '''Dismissed w/ Prejudice'''.

10. On February 7, 2017 Big Room Inc submitted trademark application # 87327563, believing it could now obtain a “.eco” trademark to provide Domain Registry Services. On September 4, 2019 that application was also refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned by .ECO®. In March 2020, the application was deemed abandoned and dead by the Trademark Office.

Big Room, Inc., a Canadian Corporation with offices in Connecticut, was made actually aware of the planet .ECO®, LLC. mark as early as 3/30/2009, when its application for a phonetically similar word-mark was denied by the USPTO on likelihood of confusion grounds under Trademark Act §2(d).

[[User:Jean william|Jean william]] ([[User talk:Jean william|talk]]) 12:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

==References==

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 I'm going to maintain the lock on the .eco page, and this is the last response I'm going to provide here.
+:
+Once again Greetings to you, Attorney J-P Voillequé,
+===I'll reiterate: "ICANN's approval of Big Room as the Registry operator for the .eco TLD" has nothing to do with the issue of "authorized delegation".===
+Do not misconstrue the obvious fact that Big Room was approved by the government contractor.  That is very obvious.
+I hope you, as an attorney working with ISOC, are not trying to suggest "approval" and the CO's authority to delegate Big Room Inc. is the same?  If so, I think that's inappropriate.
+We are obviously being treated differently, singled out and, in my humble opinion, you are helping to create and perpetuate a very strange and false narrative.
+Moving forward, under planet .ECO Trademark Litigation, please correct the following, as the global community should be made aware of the many litigations brought on by Big Room's persistent frivolous filings against us.
+'''This fact needs to be clear and transparent''' - When it comes to our trademark ".eco", '''both parties, Big Room Inc. and Doteco (TLDH), co-founded by former ICANN Board Members and Key Executives, were Dismissed With Prejudice'''.
+In total there were 6 attempts to cancel, oppose, and/or petition against us, brought by companies founded by former ICANN Board Members and Key Executive.
+To reiterate - we do not dispute any fact regarding the government contractor's recommendation to delegate foreign company Big Room Inc., pursuant with Section C.2.9.2d of DoC/NTIA Federal Contract SA1301-CN-12-0035.
+'''Without evidence, we dispute Big Room's standing and authorization to provide ".eco" Registry Operator Services, as prescribed in Section G1 - Contracting Officer's Authority.
+United States Patent and Trademark Activities and Events are shown below.
+.	On July 15, 2008 Big Room Inc. submitted trademark application # 77523010, and was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned  by .ECO®.
+.	On July 15, 2008 Big Room Inc. submitted trademark application # 77523015, and was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned  by .ECO®.
+.	On January 8, 2009 Big Room Inc  submitted trademark application # 77646029  and was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned  by .ECO®.
+.	On January 4, 2010 Doteco LLC filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92051924 against .ECO® founder Moses Boone. On January 9, 2012, the litigation was '''Dismissed with Prejudice'''.
+.	On February 17, 2012 Big Room Inc filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92055197 against .ECO®.  On July 16, 2013, the litigation was Dismissed.
+.	On April 12, 2012 Top Level Domain Holdings Inc. (TLDH), founded and operated by former ICANN Chair, Board Members and Key Executives, filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92055469 against .ECO®.  On November 2, 2012, the litigation was Dismissed.
+.	On November 20, 2014 Big Room Inc filed USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92060403 against .ECO®.  On May 28, 2015, the litigation was Dismissed.
+.	On May 29, 2015 USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 92060403 was cured  by Big Room Inc. and on July 17, 2015 again, Dismissed.
+.	On 8/28/2016, Big Room was designated the registry operator of the .ECO gTLD and 006Fn September 9, 2016 Big Room Inc filed and was granted a 90 Day Extension of  time to investigate and Oppose .ECO® “.eco” application serial # 86846214.  On December 14, 2016 Big Room Inc followed up by filing USPTO TTABVUE. Proceeding Number 91231750 against .ECO®.  On May 7, 2019, the trademark proceeding was '''Dismissed w/ Prejudice'''.
+.	On February 7, 2017 Big Room Inc submitted trademark application # 87327563, believing it could now obtain a “.eco” trademark to provide Domain Registry Services.  On September 4, 2019 that application was also refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office, due to likelihood of confusion with “.eco” mark(s) owned  by .ECO®. In March 2020, the application was deemed abandoned and dead by the Trademark Office.
+Big Room, Inc., a Canadian Corporation with offices in Connecticut, was made actually aware of the planet .ECO®, LLC. mark as early as 3/30/2009, when its application for a phonetically similar word-mark was denied by the USPTO on likelihood of confusion grounds under Trademark Act §2(d).
+[[User:Jean william|Jean william]] ([[User talk:Jean william|talk]]) 12:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 ==References==
 {{reflist}}