Second NomCom Organizational Review: Difference between revisions

Line 149:

* '''Recommendation 14''': Formalize communication between the NomCom and the Board, SOs/ACs, and the PTI Board in order to understand needed competencies and experience.

** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest to formalize the communication of the needed competencies and experiences of NomCom appointees to your SO/AC?

** ''Community Responses'':

*** There was general agreement that there should be formal and clear communication of required/desired competencies and experience.

*** The ALAC offered specific guidance on process:

**** A procedure be put in place for NomCom to formally request - at least on an annual basis - the Board, SOs/ACs, and the PTI Board to provide their understanding of their needed skills, competencies and experience for the Board, SOs/ACs and PTI Board seats to which NomCom appoints individuals. ''E.g.'' a designated task undertaken by NomCom staff as part of the Preparatory Phase I of the NomCom Cycle, under the supervision of NomCom Leadership.

**** Request by NomCom, should where possible, be accompanied by NomCom’s own assessment of any perceived gaps in the skills, competencies and experience of Board members either as a result of appointments made in the immediate past NomCom Cycle or whose seats the NomCom will be tasked to appoint individuals in the immediate next NomCom Cycle.

**** In particular, in respect of the 5 ALAC seats for which NomCom is tasked to appoint individuals, the ALAC should be asked for not only a job description for an ALAC Member position but also its understanding of the gaps in needed skills, competencies and experience of those appointed members, whether in association with or independent of Recommendation 16 and Recommendation 24, as well as other considerations such as diversity in gender.

* '''Recommendation 16''': Implement and codify a system for providing feedback to the NomCom regarding the contributions and participation of members up for re-appointment by the NomCom (i.e. for the Board, PTI, GNSO, ALAC and ccNSO)

** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest to improve feedback to the NomCom regarding the contribution and participation of NomCom appointees members that wish to apply for re-appointment by the NomCom?

@@ Line 149: / Line 149: @@
 * '''Recommendation 14''': Formalize communication between the NomCom and the Board, SOs/ACs, and the PTI Board in order to understand needed competencies and experience.
 ** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest to formalize the communication of the needed competencies and experiences of NomCom appointees to your SO/AC?
+** ''Community Responses'':
+*** There was general agreement that there should be formal and clear communication of required/desired competencies and experience.
+*** The ALAC offered specific guidance on process:
+**** A procedure be put in place for NomCom to formally request - at least on an annual basis - the Board, SOs/ACs, and the PTI Board to provide their understanding of their needed skills, competencies and experience for the Board, SOs/ACs and PTI Board seats to which NomCom appoints individuals. ''E.g.'' a designated task undertaken by NomCom staff as part of the Preparatory Phase I of the NomCom Cycle, under the supervision of NomCom Leadership.
+**** Request by NomCom, should where possible, be accompanied by NomCom’s own assessment of any perceived gaps in the skills, competencies and experience of Board members either as a result of appointments made in the immediate past NomCom Cycle or whose seats the NomCom will be tasked to appoint individuals in the immediate next NomCom Cycle.
+**** In particular, in respect of the 5 ALAC seats for which NomCom is tasked to appoint individuals, the ALAC should be asked for not only a job description for an ALAC Member position but also its understanding of the gaps in needed skills, competencies and experience of those appointed members, whether in association with or independent of Recommendation 16 and Recommendation 24, as well as other considerations such as diversity in gender.
 * '''Recommendation 16''': Implement and codify a system for providing feedback to the NomCom regarding the contributions and participation of members up for re-appointment by the NomCom (i.e. for the Board, PTI, GNSO, ALAC and ccNSO)
 ** ''IWG Question to Community'': What process would you suggest to improve feedback to the NomCom regarding the contribution and participation of NomCom appointees members that wish to apply for re-appointment by the NomCom?