Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability: Difference between revisions
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
''Participants'' were defined as anyone with an interest in the work of the CCWG-Accountability: | ''Participants'' were defined as anyone with an interest in the work of the CCWG-Accountability: | ||
<blockquote>Anyone interested can volunteer to join the CCWG as a "participant," regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Participants are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings. It is anticipated that participants will provide essential input to the process. They will participate similarly to ICANN chartering organization-appointed members and will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI).<ref name="ws1members" /> | <blockquote>Anyone interested can volunteer to join the CCWG as a "participant," regardless of whether they are members of the ICANN community. Participants are expected to actively contribute to mailing list conversations as well as meetings. It is anticipated that participants will provide essential input to the process. They will participate similarly to ICANN chartering organization-appointed members and will be required to provide a Statement of Interest (SOI).<ref name="ws1members" /></blockquote> | ||
Faced with a number of issues to address, the WS1 team divided into several work parties: legal, [[IRP]] implementation oversight, community empowerment, review & redress, emerging issues, and stress testing. Each group addressed facets of the identified work areas for the CCWG-Accountability project as a whole. During the course of its work, it became apparent that a work party should also be devoted to human rights issues. | 199 individuals submitted SOIs as participants. The distinction between appointed members and participants was a source of contention on a few occasions, including the submission of minority statements to CCWG drafts. Faced with a number of issues to address, the WS1 team divided into several work parties: legal, [[IRP]] implementation oversight, community empowerment, review & redress, emerging issues, and stress testing. Each group addressed facets of the identified work areas for the CCWG-Accountability project as a whole. During the course of its work, it became apparent that a work party should also be devoted to human rights issues. | ||
Work Stream 1 drafts, meetings, work party activities, and other information can be found in their [https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm workspace archive]. | Work Stream 1 drafts, meetings, work party activities, and other information can be found in their [https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm workspace archive]. | ||