Prioritization Framework: Difference between revisions
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# All measures are in pixels | # All measures are in pixels | ||
ImageSize = width: | ImageSize = width:800 height:500 | ||
PlotArea = left:20 right:20 bottom:20 top:20 | PlotArea = left:20 right:20 bottom:20 top:20 | ||
AlignBars = early | AlignBars = early | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
DateFormat = mm/dd/yyyy | DateFormat = mm/dd/yyyy | ||
Period = from:04/01/2021 till:07/01/2022 | Period = from:04/01/2021 till:07/01/2022 | ||
TimeAxis = orientation:vertical | TimeAxis = orientation:vertical order:reverse | ||
Colors = | Colors = | ||
id:grid value:rgb(0.9,0.9,0.9) | id:grid value:rgb(0.9,0.9,0.9) |
Revision as of 16:38, 3 November 2021
In November 2020, the ICANN Board approved a recommendation from ATRT3 to create a Prioritization Framework to integrate community, board, and org priorities into annual strategic & budget planning. The prioritization framework was intended to "achiev[e] an agreed upon definition of what it would mean for the prioritization process to “operate by consensus of the individual SO/ACs, Board, and org members that are participating in the prioritization process.”[1]
History
ICANN's Multistakeholder Model provides for the development of consensus-driven, bottom-up policy and recommendations from the community of stakeholders in the ICANN ecosystem. Over time, the generation of policy proposals, consensus advice, and recommendations has outstripped the ICANN board and orginization's ability to implement such proposals. This has resulted in bottlenecks at the board and org levels around policy implementation: the attention of the board is strained by the number of inputs from constituent bodies; and within the organization, resource limitations make it challenging to respond to all of the mandates generated by board approval of recommendations.[2] The
The Third Accountability and Transparency Review made several recommendations regarding the transparency of ICANN's decision-making process, as well as the creation of engagement processes for community-wide concerns. These included a proposed holistic review of ICANN's constituent organizations and re-factoring of existing Organizational Reviews into continuous improvement processes.[3] In addition, the review team proposed the creation of a "consensus model" for prioritizing the work of ICANN org and the recommendations derived from policy development processes, cross-community working groups, organizational and specific reviews, and other sources.[3]
Project Timeline
<timeline>
- All measures are in pixels
ImageSize = width:800 height:500 PlotArea = left:20 right:20 bottom:20 top:20 AlignBars = early
DateFormat = mm/dd/yyyy Period = from:04/01/2021 till:07/01/2022 TimeAxis = orientation:vertical order:reverse Colors =
id:grid value:rgb(0.9,0.9,0.9)
Define $dx = 25
BarData=
Barset:Phases
PlotData=
align:left textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:15 barset:Phases color:yellowgreen at:04/27/2021 shift:(2,-5) text:2021 - Project Launch Webinar from:06/01/2021 till:10/31/2021 shift:(0,-5) text:"June-October 2021 Consultation Phase with Community & Board" at:06/02/2021 shift:(2,-5) text:2021 - ICANN 71 Planning & Finance Update from:11/01/2021 till:12/31/2021 shift:($dx,-5) text:"November-December 2021 - Drafting & Publication of Briefing Paper" from:01/01/2022 till:02/28/2022 shift:($dx,-5) text:"January-February 2022 Prioritization Process Pilot" from:05/01/2022 till:06/30/2022 shift:($dx,-5) text:"May-June 2022 - Adjustments to Framework"
</timeline>
References
- ↑ ICANN.org - Board Resources: ATRT3 Scorecard, November 30, 2020
- ↑ ICANN 72 Archive - Presentation Slides - Planning Prioritization Framework Project October 13, 2021
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 ICANN.org - ATRT 3 Final Report, May 29, 2020