3,197
edits
Changes
Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data (view source)
Revision as of 22:17, 16 December 2021
, 2 years ago→Addendum to Initial Report
* Accuracy and WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System<ref name="2addendum" />
* Accuracy and WHOIS Accuracy Reporting System<ref name="2addendum" />
The addendum included three additional recommendations and several "preliminary conclusions," with conclusions ranging from reports of significant divergence of opinion on issues to preliminary assessments that the status quo likely did not need to be changed:<ref name="2addendum" />
* Recommendation 20: In situations where an accredited privacy/proxy service is used, the registrar (and registry, if applicable) must include the full RDDS data of the service in response to an RDDS query. The data may include an anonymized email.
* Recommendation 21: "The EPDP Team confirms its recommendation from Phase 1 that registrars be required to retain only those data elements deemed necessary for the purposes of the [[TDRP]], for a period of fifteen months following the life of the registration plus three months to implement the deletion, i.e., 18 months."
* Recommendation 22: Add "contribute to the maintenance of the security, stability, and resiliency of the Domain Name System in accordance with ICANN's mission" to the "ICANN Purposes for processing gTLD registration data" listed in Recommendation 1 of the Phase 1 Final Report.
* Legal vs. natural persons: "There is a persistent divergence of opinion on if/how to address this topic within the EPDP Team."
* City field redaction: No changes recommended to the Phase 1 recommendation that redaction must be applied to the city field.
* Office of Chief Technology Officer: No need to propose additional purpose(s) to facilitate ICANN's OCTO in carrying out its mission.
* Feasibility of unique contacts to have a uniform anonymized email address: EPDP team received legal guidance<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/EOTSFGRD/EPDP+-P2+Legal+subteam?preview=/111388744/126424478/Memo%20-%20ICANN%20-%2004.02.2020.docx EPDP Workspace - Bird & Bird Memo re: "Batch 2" of questions regarding SSAD, proxies, pseudonymous emails], February 4, 2020</ref> that publication of uniform masked email addresses represents the publication of personal data under the GDPR. Therefore, this policy does not appear to be feasible.
* Accuracy of WHOIS data and WHOIS accuracy reporting system: Per instructions from GNSO Council, the EPDP team will not pursue this issues during Phase 2. Instead, the GNSO will form a scoping team to identify what next steps should be regarding these topics.<ref name="2addendum" />
The Addendum was published for public comment in March 2020.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/addendum-to-the-initial-report-of-the-expedited-policy-development-process-epdp-on-the-temporary-specification-for-gtld-registration-data-team--phase-2-26-03-2020 Public Comment Proceeding: EPDP Temp Spec Phase 2 - Addendum to Initial Report], last updated May 19, 2020</ref> The EPDP team again prepared an intake form for responses. Many constituencies and advisory committees expressed dismay at the lack of progress on many serious issues, and in particular those issues for which "preliminary conclusions" were reported.<ref>[https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=126430750&preview=/126430750/134513571/gnso-EPDP-P2-pcrt-Initial-Report-Addendum-Recommendations_Addendum_Issues_20200506.docx EPDP Workspace - Collated General Comments], May 6, 2020 (.docx)</ref>
====Final Report====
====Final Report====