Documentary Information Disclosure Policy: Difference between revisions

Line 573:

| After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/acharya-response-19feb15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150120-1-2015-02-24-en document was published in March]

| Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, & 9

|

|-

| 6 February 2015

| Centre for Internet and Society

| Details of contract fees paid by the [[Regional Internet Registry|RIRs]] from 1999-2014, including a breakdown of contributions from each.

| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-08mar15-en.pdf Pointed to published financial information], no other documents released

| No

| The response noted that NRO only published breakdowns of contributions by RIR for three years from 2003-2005

|-

| 11 February 2015

| Kin Sun

| Documents related to allegedly unauthorized transfer(s) of a domain name

| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-13mar15-en.pdf Declined]

| 3 & 5

|

|-

| 12 March 2015

| [[James Gannon]]

| Disclosure of Root Zone KSK Operator Function Termination Plan specified in Section C.7.3 of the IANA Functions Contract between ICANN and the NTIA

| After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150312-1-gannon-25mar15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150312-1-2015-03-25-en document was published in March]

| Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10

| Essentially the same request as Guru Archarya, above

|-

| 14 March 2015

| [[James Gannon]]

| Disclosure of Contingency and Continuity of Operations Plan as specified in Section C.7.2 in the IANA Functions contract between ICANN and the NTIA

| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150314-1-gannon-25mar15-en.pdf Declined]

| 1, 3, 6, 10, & 11

| Response notes that disclosure of the plan "could pose a threat to the stability and security of the Internet and domain name system," because the plan includes details of response & recovery planning in the event of targeted disruption of the Internet.

|-

| 7 April 2015

| [[Paul Kane]]

| Workflow process documents with statistics for each stage of the IANA Root Zone Management Function

| After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150407-1-kane-07may15-en.pdf initially responding] that staff would have to consult with all involved parties regarding publication of the information, staff later [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150407-1-2015-05-08-en updated the record] to note that the information had been published

| Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, & 11

|

|-

| 27 April 2015

| James Bridle

| Documents relating to the delegation and operation of [[.io]], including correspondence between ICANN and the delegated authority

| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150427-1-bridle-27may15-en.pdf Provided context] but did not produce documents

| 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10

| [[.io]] is an [[Open Use ccTLD]] that was delegated by IANA in 1997, prior to the formation of ICANN, and using IANA's standard procedure for assigning operation of [[ccTLD]]s, as described in [[RFC 1591]]

|-

| 5 June 2015

| [[Flip Petillion]]

| Information & documents regarding the data exposure issues in the new gTLD application and GDD portals that exposed the data of [[.hotel]] applicants and others.

| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150605-1-petillion-05jul15-en.pdf Provided a narrative] of the data exposure incident as related through ICANN's public announcements and updates on the issue; did not produce new documents

| 2, 5, 6, 8, & 9

|

|}

==References==

@@ Line 573: / Line 573: @@
 | After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/acharya-response-19feb15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150120-1-2015-02-24-en document was published in March]
 | Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, & 9
+|
+|-
+| 6 February 2015
+| Centre for Internet and Society
+| Details of contract fees paid by the [[Regional Internet Registry|RIRs]] from 1999-2014, including a breakdown of contributions from each.
+| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/cis-response-08mar15-en.pdf Pointed to published financial information], no other documents released
+| No
+| The response noted that NRO only published breakdowns of contributions by RIR for three years from 2003-2005
+|-
+| 11 February 2015
+| Kin Sun
+| Documents related to allegedly unauthorized transfer(s) of a domain name
+| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-13mar15-en.pdf Declined]
+| 3 & 5
+|
+|-
+| 12 March 2015
+| [[James Gannon]]
+| Disclosure of Root Zone KSK Operator Function Termination Plan specified in Section C.7.3 of the IANA Functions Contract between ICANN and the NTIA
+| After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150312-1-gannon-25mar15-en.pdf initially responding] that it needed to consult with the parties to the contract to get consensus on making the plan publicly available, staff provided an update that the [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150312-1-2015-03-25-en document was published in March]
+| Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10
+| Essentially the same request as Guru Archarya, above
+|-
+| 14 March 2015
+| [[James Gannon]]
+| Disclosure of Contingency and Continuity of Operations Plan as specified in Section C.7.2 in the IANA Functions contract between ICANN and the NTIA
+| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150314-1-gannon-25mar15-en.pdf Declined]
+| 1, 3, 6, 10, & 11
+| Response notes that disclosure of the plan "could pose a threat to the stability and security of the Internet and domain name system," because the plan includes details of response & recovery planning in the event of targeted disruption of the Internet.
+|-
+| 7 April 2015
+| [[Paul Kane]]
+| Workflow process documents with statistics for each stage of the IANA Root Zone Management Function
+| After [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150407-1-kane-07may15-en.pdf initially responding] that staff would have to consult with all involved parties regarding publication of the information, staff later [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/20150407-1-2015-05-08-en updated the record] to note that the information had been published
+| Initial response cited 1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10, & 11
+|
+|-
+| 27 April 2015
+| James Bridle
+| Documents relating to the delegation and operation of [[.io]], including correspondence between ICANN and the delegated authority
+| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150427-1-bridle-27may15-en.pdf Provided context] but did not produce documents
+| 1, 2, 3, 9, & 10
+| [[.io]] is an [[Open Use ccTLD]] that was delegated by IANA in 1997, prior to the formation of ICANN, and using IANA's standard procedure for assigning operation of [[ccTLD]]s, as described in [[RFC 1591]]
+|-
+| 5 June 2015
+| [[Flip Petillion]]
+| Information & documents regarding the data exposure issues in the new gTLD application and GDD portals that exposed the data of [[.hotel]] applicants and others.
+| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150605-1-petillion-05jul15-en.pdf Provided a narrative] of the data exposure incident as related through ICANN's public announcements and updates on the issue; did not produce new documents
+| 2, 5, 6, 8, & 9
 |
 |}
 ==References==