icannwiki

Documentary Information Disclosure Policy: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
JP (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197 edits
JP (talk | contribs)
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197 edits
Line 948: Line 948:
| No
| No
| In response to both items, ICANN noted that there were as yet no documents responsive to the requests
| In response to both items, ICANN noted that there were as yet no documents responsive to the requests
|-
| 25 January 2017
| Ben Sobel
| Information related to (1) the initial delegation of the [[.pr]] [[ccTLD]] to the University of Puerto Rico, and (2) documents, correspondence, and other records related to redelegation requests and decisions for [[.ag]], [[.bb]], [[.bz]], [[.bs]], [[.dm]], [[.do]], [[.gd]], [[.gy]], [[.jm]], [[.kn]], [[.lc]], [[.sr]], [[.tt]], and [[.vc]] during the time that those ccTLDs were managed by the University of Puerto Rico.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170125-1-sobel-response-24feb17-en.pdf Pointed] to published IANA reports and board meeting minutes related to some redelegation requests that were responsive to the query; noted several cases where delegation pre-dated ICANN. Request for "correspondence" denied.
| 1, 2, 3, & 10
|
|-
| 14 February 2017
| [[Michael Palage]]
| "Documents, initatives and research dealing with the blockchain and distributed ledger technology (DLT) in connection with the DNS and other unique identifiers schemes/frameworks"
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170214-1-palage-response-16mar17-en.pdf Declined]
| 2, 9, & 10
|
|-
| 5 May 2017
| Arif Ali on behalf of DotMusic Limited
| Documents related to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process review, including documents provided by the reviewing third party to ICANN. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170505-1-ali-request-05may17-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170505-1-ali-response-04jun17-en.pdf Pointed to public information]; denied request for documents from reviewer to ICANN on DCND grounds.
| 2, 3, 8, & 9
|
|-
| 6 May 2017
| Avri Doria
| Documents related to ICANN & the ICANN Board responses to SSAC 045, which identified potential risks associated with the [[New gTLD Program]] in situations where previously invalid TLD strings were awarded to a registry during the applications process. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170506-1-doria-request-06may17-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170506-1-doria-response-05jun17-en.pdf Provided public documents, history, and context] but declined to disclose additional documents.
| 2, 8, 9, & 10
| SSAC 045 finds in part: "ICANN should make applicants for new TLDs aware of the following: Any new TLD registry operator may experience unanticipated queries and some TLDs may experience a non-trivial load of unanticipated queries if the label it chooses corresponds to TLDs that have historically seen queries.Studies illustrate that the amount of inherited query traffic could be considerable, i.e., on the order of millions of queries per day, should the applicant’s chosen string be one that appears frequently at the root. While millions of queries per day is manageable from an operational perspective, it is prudent for ICANN to make applicants aware of the potential for inherited traffic so they are prepared to manage the volume, and will thus minimize the possibility of operational difficulties that would pose a stability or availability problem for their registrants and users.
|-
| 18 May 2017
| Arif Ali on behalf of dotgay LLC
| Documents related to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process review, including documents provided by the reviewing third party to ICANN. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170518-1-ali-request-18may17-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170518-1-ali-response-18jun17-en.pdf Pointed to public information], otherwise declined.
| 2, 3, 8, & 9
| Response noted the similarity of Ali's two requests for similar information on behalf of two separate clients, and made reference to the earlier response re: DotMusic Limited
|-
| 8 June 2017
| Shaul Jolles on behalf of Dot Registry, LLC
| "Any and all" documents related to Dot Registry's community applications for [[.inc]], [[.llc]], and [[.llp]] that were used, produced, or contained in the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process review. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170608-1-shaul-jolles-obo-dot-registry-llc-request-08jun17-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170608-1-shaul-jolles-obo-dot-registry-llc-response-08jul17-en.pdf Pointed to public information]
| No
| "With the exception of the correspondence between ICANN organization and the CPE provider regarding the evaluations, all materials provided to the evaluator are publicly available. Regarding the correspondence between ICANN organization and the CPE provider regarding the evaluations, including any document and draft CPE reports that were exchanged concerning the evaluation of Dot Registry’s applications for .INC, .LLP, and .LLC, these documents were provided to Dot Registry in the IRP pursuant to the Panel’s order regarding document production."
|-
|
| Arif Ali on behalf of DotMusic Limited and dotgay LLC
| Documents relating to the selection of and process employed by the third party reviewer of the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process (items 1 and 3); list of ICANN staff, board members, agents, etc. that were interviewed as part of the CPE process review (item 2); and confirmation that "ICANN will disclose FTI's final report to the CPE applicants...immediately after FTI completes its review." (item 4) [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170610-1-ali-obo-dotgay-et-al-request-redacted-10jun17-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170610-1-ali-obo-dotgay-et-al-response-10jul17-en.pdf Responded that]: Items 1 & 3 were asked and answered in Ali's prior DIDP requests; items 2 & 4 are "not appropriate DIDP request[s]," and in any event are subject to DCNDs.
| 2, 3, & 8
|
|-
| 13 June 2017
| Vidushi Marda on behalf of the Centre for Internet and Society
| Requesting "detailed reports with historical data on income and revenue contributions from domain names, for FY15 and FY16, in the manner in which FY13 and FY14 were published;" and requesting a status updated regarding a similar planned report for FY 2012
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170613-1-marda-obo-cis-response-13jul17-en.pdf Responded] with estimated timeframes until the publication of those reports
| No
|
|-
| 14 June 2017
| [[Flip Petillion]] on behalf of Travel Reservations SRL, Spring McCook, LLC, Minds + Machines Group Limited, Famous Four Media Limited, dot Hotel Limited, Radix FZC, dot Hotel Inc., and Fegistry, LLC
| Documents related to the selection of FTI as the third party reviewer for the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process review, and information pertaining to FTI's process, documents submitted to FTI, and any other details.
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170614-1-petillion-obo-travel-reservations-srl-et-al-response-14jul17-en.pdf Responded] with links to public information, referred to prior response to Petillion regarding the DCNDs that prevented disclosure of any other documents.
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
|
|-
| 27 July 2017
| Karl S. Kronenberger
| "All documents supporting or related to" [[Cyrus Namazi]]'s comment at a cross-community presentation at [[ICANN 59]] regarding the predicted loss of approximately 750 accredited registrars during FY 2018. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170727-1-kronenberger-request-redacted-27jul17-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20170727-1-kronenberger-response-26aug17-en.pdf Pointed to public information], declined to disclose additional documents
| 2, 3, 5, & 9
|
|-
| 10 January 2018
| Arif Ali on behalf of DotMusic Limited
| Laundry list of documents related to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process review. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180110-1-ali-request-redacted-10jan18-en.pdf Full request]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180110-1-ali-response-redacted-09feb18-en.pdf Declined]
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, & 9
|
|-
| 15 January 2018
| Arif Ali on behalf of dotgay LLC
| Similar laundry list request for documents related to the [[Community Priority Evaluation]] process review. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180115-1-ali-request-redacted-15jan18-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180115-1-ali-response-redacted-14feb18-en.pdf Similarly denied]
| 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, & 9
|
|-
| 1 February 2018
| Michael Karanicolas
| (1) criteria for selection of "Regional Newcomer" fellows for [[ICANN 62]]; (2) the budget allocated for those fellows; and (3) the total number of regional newcomers selected
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20180201-1-karanicolas-response-02mar18-en.pdf Responded] with details, history, and links to public information; request spurred ICANN to produce additional documentation for the program; ICANN declined to release emails that were responsive because of DCNDs
| 2, 3, & 9
|
|}
|}


==References==
==References==
Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/Documentary_Information_Disclosure_Policy"