Independent Review Process: Difference between revisions

Line 54:

** Claims regarding [[PTI]] service complaints by direct customers of the IANA naming functions that are not resolved through mediation.

** Article 4.3(c) expressly excludes the following types of claims from the scope of the IRP: [[Empowered Community|EC]] challenges to the result(s) of a [[PDP]], unless the Supporting Organization(s) that approved the PDP supports the EC bringing such a challenge; claims relating to [[ccTLD]] delegations and re-delegations; claims relating to Internet numbering resources; and claims relating to protocol parameters.<ref name="art4" /> In other words, the IRP may not be used to appeal or challenge the core functions of ICANN's mission, or undermine bottom-up policy development.

* The ''Cooperative Engagement Process'' is an optional, preliminary, non-binding process "to resolve and/or narrow the Dispute."

* The ''Cooperative Engagement Process'' (CEP) is an optional, preliminary, non-binding process "to resolve and/or narrow the Dispute." Parties to a CEP may request an ''IRP Mediator'' to facilitate meetings under the CEP. The IRP Mediator is ineligible for appointment to the IRP Panel regarding the Dispute.

*

* The ''IRP Panel'' is a three-member panel appointed to preside over and make findings and decisions regarding a Dispute.

* The ''IRP Provider'' is the "well-respected international dispute resolution provider" that administers proceedings under the IRP. The current IRP Provider is the [[International Centre for Dispute Resolution]].<ref>[https://www.icdr.org/icann ICDR.org - ICANN Programs]</ref>

==ICM Registry LLC Request for IRP==

@@ Line 54: / Line 54: @@
 ** Claims regarding [[PTI]] service complaints by direct customers of the IANA naming functions that are not resolved through mediation.
 ** Article 4.3(c) expressly excludes the following types of claims from the scope of the IRP: [[Empowered Community|EC]] challenges to the result(s) of a [[PDP]], unless the Supporting Organization(s) that approved the PDP supports the EC bringing such a challenge; claims relating to [[ccTLD]] delegations and re-delegations; claims relating to Internet numbering resources; and claims relating to protocol parameters.<ref name="art4" /> In other words, the IRP may not be used to appeal or challenge the core functions of ICANN's mission, or undermine bottom-up policy development.
-* The ''Cooperative Engagement Process'' is an optional, preliminary, non-binding process "to resolve and/or narrow the Dispute."
+* The ''Cooperative Engagement Process'' (CEP) is an optional, preliminary, non-binding process "to resolve and/or narrow the Dispute." Parties to a CEP may request an ''IRP Mediator'' to facilitate meetings under the CEP. The IRP Mediator is ineligible for appointment to the IRP Panel regarding the Dispute.
-*
+* The ''IRP Panel'' is a three-member panel appointed to preside over and make findings and decisions regarding a Dispute.
+* The ''IRP Provider'' is the "well-respected international dispute resolution provider" that administers proceedings under the IRP. The current IRP Provider is the [[International Centre for Dispute Resolution]].<ref>[https://www.icdr.org/icann ICDR.org - ICANN Programs]</ref>
 ==ICM Registry LLC Request for IRP==