User:Colby/Non-existent TLDs: Difference between revisions
s/list/shortlist/ |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* [[.cube|cube]] | * [[.cube|cube]] | ||
* [[.hole|hole]] | |||
* [[.lmno|lmno]] (compare [[.xyz]]) | * [[.lmno|lmno]] (compare [[.xyz]]) | ||
* [[.moon|moon]] (compare [[.earth]]) | * [[.moon|moon]] (compare [[.earth]]) | ||
* [[.pipe|pipe]] (compare [[.dev]], [[.tech]]) | * [[.pipe|pipe]] (compare [[.dev]], [[.tech]]) | ||
* [[.okay|okay]] | * [[.okay|okay]] | ||
* [[.stack|stack]] | |||
* [[.what|what]] | |||
I consider "lmno" to be especially tenuous, for example—but I could be wrong and it might be the complete opposite. Hard to say, but I think "pipe" and "moon" are particularly ripe for market. | I consider "lmno" to be especially tenuous, for example—but I could be wrong and it might be the complete opposite. Hard to say, but I think "pipe" and "moon" are particularly ripe for market. | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 15 July 2024
While reviewing the availability of TLDs and the trends in new gTLD name selection, I've begun keeping a shortlist of those where I found myself at least mildly surprised and/or interested in the fact that they don't exist. Each represents a potential opportunity (some more tenuous than others). Here is the list so far:
I consider "lmno" to be especially tenuous, for example—but I could be wrong and it might be the complete opposite. Hard to say, but I think "pipe" and "moon" are particularly ripe for market.