ICANN Reviews: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''ICANN Reviews''' assess the organizations and its Supporting Organizations (SOs), Nominating Committee, Technical Liaison Group, Advisory Committees and the Board of Directors in order to measure their operational efficacy and accountability to the broader ICANN community.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/org ICANN Organizational Reviews]. Retrieved 08 May 2017.</ref> | '''ICANN Reviews''' assess the organizations and its Supporting Organizations (SOs), Nominating Committee, Technical Liaison Group, Advisory Committees and the Board of Directors in order to measure their operational efficacy and accountability to the broader ICANN community.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/org ICANN Organizational Reviews]. Retrieved 08 May 2017.</ref> | ||
The reviews aim to evaluate a number of programs and processes within ICANN, but can concern the future of the new gTLD program, ICANN transparency and accountability, as well as the Security, Stability, and Resilience of the new domain name system. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 19:38, 8 May 2017
ICANN Reviews assess the organizations and its Supporting Organizations (SOs), Nominating Committee, Technical Liaison Group, Advisory Committees and the Board of Directors in order to measure their operational efficacy and accountability to the broader ICANN community.[1]
The reviews aim to evaluate a number of programs and processes within ICANN, but can concern the future of the new gTLD program, ICANN transparency and accountability, as well as the Security, Stability, and Resilience of the new domain name system.
References
- ↑ ICANN Organizational Reviews. Retrieved 08 May 2017.