Jump to content

Batching: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
No edit summary
Caterina (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Batching''' is a term that began buzzing during [[ICANN 42]] in Dakar.<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/icann-new-gtlds-details-dominate-debate-at-icann-42-in-dakar.html ICANN New gTLDs Details Dominate Debate at ICANN 42, DomainNews.com]</ref> At that time, the new [[gTLD]] program had already been approved and [[ICANN]] was focusing on how it would implement the application process. Given that they expected to receive over 1,000 applications, and that they knew their staff could not process over 500 applications at a time, it would be necessary to create separate '''batches''' to process all applications. This immediately worried potential applicants, and it was unclear whether a lottery or a system that rewarded early application would be implemented. In December, 2011, just weeks before the window opened, the [[ICANN Board| board]] held a special meeting and further discussed the batching process. It was made clear that a lottery would not be used, nor would an application submitted earlier than another have an advantage. Still, the system was not defined, and it was clear that they would continue to formulate this process as they received applications and progressed towards the April, 2012 deadline. They had decided that all global regions would be fairly represented in each batch, and that there would be an opt-out mechanism for non-priority applications.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-leaves-new-gtld-batching-and-support-quest ICANN Leaves New gTLD Batching and Support Quest, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
'''Batching''', a term that became especially popular during [[ICANN 42]] in Dakar,<ref>[http://www.domainnews.com/en/icann-new-gtlds-details-dominate-debate-at-icann-42-in-dakar.html ICANN New gTLDs Details Dominate Debate at ICANN 42, DomainNews.com]</ref> refers to the process of dividing applications for the new gTLD program into batches. Given that [[ICANN]] expected to receive over 1,000 applications, and that they knew their staff could not process over 500 applications at a time, the Board decided that it would be necessary to create separate batches to process the applications. This immediately worried potential applicants, as it was unclear whether a lottery or a system that rewarded early application would be implemented. In December, 2011, just weeks before the window opened, the [[ICANN Board|Board]] held a special meeting, where they further discussed the batching process. It was made clear that a lottery would not be used, nor would an application submitted earlier than another have an advantage. Still, the system was not defined, and it was clear that they would continue to formulate this process as they received applications and progressed towards the April, 2012 deadline. The Board did decide that all global regions would be fairly represented in each batch, and that there would be an opt-out mechanism for non-priority applications.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-leaves-new-gtld-batching-and-support-quest ICANN Leaves New gTLD Batching and Support Quest, DomainIncite.com]</ref>


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 22:50, 9 January 2012

Batching, a term that became especially popular during ICANN 42 in Dakar,[1] refers to the process of dividing applications for the new gTLD program into batches. Given that ICANN expected to receive over 1,000 applications, and that they knew their staff could not process over 500 applications at a time, the Board decided that it would be necessary to create separate batches to process the applications. This immediately worried potential applicants, as it was unclear whether a lottery or a system that rewarded early application would be implemented. In December, 2011, just weeks before the window opened, the Board held a special meeting, where they further discussed the batching process. It was made clear that a lottery would not be used, nor would an application submitted earlier than another have an advantage. Still, the system was not defined, and it was clear that they would continue to formulate this process as they received applications and progressed towards the April, 2012 deadline. The Board did decide that all global regions would be fairly represented in each batch, and that there would be an opt-out mechanism for non-priority applications.[2]

References