Jump to content

.hair: Difference between revisions

From ICANNWiki
Line 22: Line 22:
# [[Your Hair Limited]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Hair Status, ICANN.org]</ref>
# [[Your Hair Limited]]<ref>[http://gtldresult.icann.org/application-result/applicationstatus/viewstatus Hair Status, ICANN.org]</ref>


===L'Oréal==
===L'Oréal===
The application from [[L'Oréal]] was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>
The application from [[L'Oréal]] was issued a [[GAC]] Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, [[Heather Dryden]]. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the [[ICANN Board]] that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-early-warning GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org] Retrieved 25 Nov 2012</ref>



Revision as of 00:16, 26 November 2012

Status: Proposed
Type: Generic
Category: Lifestyle

More information:

.hair is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program.

Applicants[edit | edit source]

  1. L'Oréal
  2. Your Hair Limited[1]

L'Oréal[edit | edit source]

The application from L'Oréal was issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[2]

The warning states that the applicant is "seeking exclusive access to a common generic string .. that relates to a broad market sector," which Ms. Dryden notes could have unintended consequences and a negative impact on competition.[3]

References[edit | edit source]