Innovative Auctions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==ICANN New gTLD Auctions== | ==ICANN New gTLD Auctions== | ||
In response to the need | In response to the need to determine winners of contention sets for each TLD applied for by more than one applicant, numerous companies have offered their own models [[gTLD Auction|gTLD auction models]] in contrast to ICANN's private auctions, which are by definition a last resort. Cramton Associates is one of the companies offering private auction models, along with [[Sedo]] and [[Right of the Dot]]. All three groups offer slight variations on implementation and services but share commonalities in their proposed models. In all cases, the winner will pay the amount of the second-highest bid, and money will be split either equally or proportionally between the losers, so that all applicants receive a percentage of their initial investment back.<ref name="worldipreview">[http://www.worldipreview.com/newsstory.asp?ID=46 New gTLD applicants ponder private auctions], WorldIPreview.com. Published 14 November 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2012.</ref> All applicants must agree to participate in a private auction model in order for it to proceed; otherwise, the contention set will be managed via ICANN's auction system, in which all proceeds go to ICANN as "excess funds" that will be allocated at a later date.<ref>[http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2012/11/icann_s_gtld_auction_proceeds_should_be_used_to_bring_mesh_technologies.html ICANN, Make a Difference], Slate.com. Published 27 November 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2012.</ref> | ||
During [[ICANN 45]] in Toronto, Peter Cramton outlined an "ascending clock" model, where a price is increased by the auctioneer at each stage; bidders and sellers can then either drop out or bid on the increased amount.<ref name="domainincite">[http://domainincite.com/10828-heres-how-donuts-wants-to-resolve-its-158-new-gtld-contention-fights Here's how Donuts wants to resolve its 158 new gTLD contention fights]. Domain Incite. Published 2012 October 23. Retrieved 2012 November 13.</ref> This model is also preferred by Right | During [[ICANN 45]] in Toronto, Peter Cramton outlined an "ascending clock" model, where a price is increased by the auctioneer at each stage; bidders and sellers can then either drop out or bid on the increased amount.<ref name="domainincite">[http://domainincite.com/10828-heres-how-donuts-wants-to-resolve-its-158-new-gtld-contention-fights Here's how Donuts wants to resolve its 158 new gTLD contention fights]. Domain Incite. Published 2012 October 23. Retrieved 2012 November 13.</ref> This model is also preferred by [[Right of the Dot]], though it has also proposed "sealed bid" and "live auction" models. In a sealed bid model, applicants securely send money via a courier and packages are stored in a safe place until they are opened at the auction session.<ref name="worldipreview"></ref> | ||
Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected | Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected as the other applicants will have withdraw already, and the new gTLD would be left without an owner. The former model also lumped all TLDs that an individual applicant had applied for in one package. Criticisms stating that such a model would benefit larger companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.<ref name="domainincite"></ref> | ||
Some large players, such as [[Donuts]], cited preference for Cramton's method.<ref name="domainincite"></ref> | Some large players, such as [[Donuts]], cited preference for Cramton's method.<ref name="domainincite"></ref> | ||
Revision as of 20:55, 31 December 2012
 | |
| ICANNWiki Bronze Sponsor | |
| Founded: | 1993 |
| Headquarters: | 6418 Dahlonega Rd. Bethesda MD 20816 |
| Country: | USA |
| Website: | Cramton Associates |
| Key People | |
| Peter Cramton, Chairman Pat Sujarittanonta, Affiliate | |
Cramton Associates specializes in providing advice on auction and market design for multiple industries in many different countries. It was founded by Chairman Peter Cramton, who is a lead expert on auction design and strategy. He is aided by Pat Sujarittanonta as Affiliate.[1]
Products and Services[edit | edit source]
Cramton Associates offers complex analyses services, with the following points of interest:[2]
- Data Visualization - Visual data presentation via Tableau.
- Mathematical Analysis - Projections of data and possibilities, including the simulation of alternative auction designs, via Mathematica and MatLab.
- Optimization - Optimization for identifying winners and pricing packages in combinatorial auctions by optimizing programming, via CPLEX and Gurobi.
- Presentation - Excel data reports via Office 2010.
- Statistical Analysis - Data organization and analysis, via Stata.
Affiliates[edit | edit source]
The company is associated with Market Design Inc., a company offering consulting services for the design of auction markets, as well as Power Auctions LLC, a provider of software, technology, consulting services, and intellectual property for advanced auction applications.[3]
ICANN New gTLD Auctions[edit | edit source]
In response to the need to determine winners of contention sets for each TLD applied for by more than one applicant, numerous companies have offered their own models gTLD auction models in contrast to ICANN's private auctions, which are by definition a last resort. Cramton Associates is one of the companies offering private auction models, along with Sedo and Right of the Dot. All three groups offer slight variations on implementation and services but share commonalities in their proposed models. In all cases, the winner will pay the amount of the second-highest bid, and money will be split either equally or proportionally between the losers, so that all applicants receive a percentage of their initial investment back.[4] All applicants must agree to participate in a private auction model in order for it to proceed; otherwise, the contention set will be managed via ICANN's auction system, in which all proceeds go to ICANN as "excess funds" that will be allocated at a later date.[5]
During ICANN 45 in Toronto, Peter Cramton outlined an "ascending clock" model, where a price is increased by the auctioneer at each stage; bidders and sellers can then either drop out or bid on the increased amount.[6] This model is also preferred by Right of the Dot, though it has also proposed "sealed bid" and "live auction" models. In a sealed bid model, applicants securely send money via a courier and packages are stored in a safe place until they are opened at the auction session.[4]
Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected as the other applicants will have withdraw already, and the new gTLD would be left without an owner. The former model also lumped all TLDs that an individual applicant had applied for in one package. Criticisms stating that such a model would benefit larger companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.[6]
Some large players, such as Donuts, cited preference for Cramton's method.[6]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Cramton Associates, cramton.umd.edu.ca. Retrieved 30 December 2012.
- ↑ Tools, cramton.umd.edu.ca. Retrieved 30 December 2012.
- ↑ Affiliates, cramton.umd.edu/ca/affiliates. Retrieved 30 December 2012.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 New gTLD applicants ponder private auctions, WorldIPreview.com. Published 14 November 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
- ↑ ICANN, Make a Difference, Slate.com. Published 27 November 2012. Retrieved 6 December 2012.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Here's how Donuts wants to resolve its 158 new gTLD contention fights. Domain Incite. Published 2012 October 23. Retrieved 2012 November 13.