.charity: Difference between revisions
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
===IO Objection=== | ===IO Objection=== | ||
[[ICANN]]'s [[Independent Objector]] (IO) filed a '''Community Objection''' against the .charity string. The IO is an appointed authority on international law whose role is to object to strings on the grounds of Community harm and Limited Public Interest were detailed in the applicant guidebook. His objections are official objections and are funded by ICANN, though his office is otherwise independent. Reasons for the specific case against .charity were not initially given, but the community objection generally argues that the TLD faces opposition or is contrary to a significant portion of a community which it purportedly aims to serve. The IO must determine: That the community is a clearly delineated community; that there is a strong association between the community and the string applied for; there is a strong association between the segment of the community on whose half we objects and the string itself; and he must determine that the TLD would produce a significant material detriment to this sizable portion of the community.<ref>[http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/community-objections/ Community Objections, Independent Objector New gTlds.org] Retrieved 14 Mar 2013</ref> | [[ICANN]]'s [[Independent Objector]] (IO) filed a '''Community Objection''' against both applications for the .charity string. The IO is an appointed authority on international law whose role is to object to strings on the grounds of Community harm and Limited Public Interest were detailed in the applicant guidebook. His objections are official objections and are funded by ICANN, though his office is otherwise independent. Reasons for the specific case against .charity were not initially given, but the community objection generally argues that the TLD faces opposition or is contrary to a significant portion of a community which it purportedly aims to serve. The IO must determine: That the community is a clearly delineated community; that there is a strong association between the community and the string applied for; there is a strong association between the segment of the community on whose half we objects and the string itself; and he must determine that the TLD would produce a significant material detriment to this sizable portion of the community.<ref>[http://www.independent-objector-newgtlds.org/english-version/community-objections/ Community Objections, Independent Objector New gTlds.org] Retrieved 14 Mar 2013</ref> | ||
He also objected to | He also objected to the Chinese IDN version that translates as "charity", [[.慈善]], which was submitted by [[Zodiac]]. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 16:03, 14 March 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Commerce |
| Priority #: | 1107 - Donuts (Corn Lake, LLC) 1312 - Famous Four Media (Spring Registry Limited) |
More information: 
| |
.charity is a new generic top level domain name (gTLD) applied for in ICANN's New gTLD Program.
Current Applicants[edit | edit source]
The applicants are:[1]
- Donuts (Corn Lake, LLC), a start-up registry operator that applied for 307 new gTLDs, each via a different LLC.[2] This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
- Famous Four Media (Spring Registry Limited), a company based in Gibraltar represented by Geir Rasmussen, it has applied for 61 new gTLDs. [3] This applicant submitted a Public Interest Commitment, which can be downloaded here.
GAC Early Warning[edit | edit source]
Both applicants for .charity were issued a GAC Early Warning from the representative of Australia and GAC Chair, Heather Dryden. The warning system is noted as a strong recommendation on behalf of national governments to the ICANN Board that a given TLD application should be denied as it stands. Applicants are encouraged to work with objecting GAC members.[4] The .charity warnings note that the TLD refers to a regulated market sector but notes there are not sufficient protection mechanisms designed to prevent consumer harm.[5]
IO Objection[edit | edit source]
ICANN's Independent Objector (IO) filed a Community Objection against both applications for the .charity string. The IO is an appointed authority on international law whose role is to object to strings on the grounds of Community harm and Limited Public Interest were detailed in the applicant guidebook. His objections are official objections and are funded by ICANN, though his office is otherwise independent. Reasons for the specific case against .charity were not initially given, but the community objection generally argues that the TLD faces opposition or is contrary to a significant portion of a community which it purportedly aims to serve. The IO must determine: That the community is a clearly delineated community; that there is a strong association between the community and the string applied for; there is a strong association between the segment of the community on whose half we objects and the string itself; and he must determine that the TLD would produce a significant material detriment to this sizable portion of the community.[6]
He also objected to the Chinese IDN version that translates as "charity", .慈善, which was submitted by Zodiac.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings
- ↑ Donuts Inc eye popping list of 307 new top-level domains
- ↑ Famous Four Media Applies For 61 Generic TLD’s...
- ↑ GAC Early Warning, NewgTLDS.ICANN.org Retrieved 24 Nov 2012
- ↑ Charity AU, GACweb.ICANN.org Retrieved 24 Nov 2012
- ↑ Community Objections, Independent Objector New gTlds.org Retrieved 14 Mar 2013