.tours: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==String Confusion Objection== | ==String Confusion Objection== | ||
[[Google]] submitted an objection to the International Centre for Dispute Resolution ([[ICDR]]), saying that the [[.tour]] and .tours strings would confuse Internet users. Panelist [[Robert M Nau]] ruled on the side of Google. This decision will put [[Donuts]], the sole applicant for .tours, into a contention set with [[Google]] | [[Google]] submitted an objection to the International Centre for Dispute Resolution ([[ICDR]]), saying that the [[.tour]] and .tours strings would confuse Internet users. Panelist [[Robert M Nau]] ruled on the side of Google. This decision will put [[Donuts]], the sole applicant for .tours, into a contention set with [[Google]] for the [[.tour]] gTLD.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2013/08/26/nau-strikes-again-google-wins-tours-objection-against-donuts/ Nau Strikes Again, Google Wins .tours Objection Against Donuts, Domain Name Wire] Retrieved 25 Sept 2013</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 18:54, 25 September 2013
| Status: | Proposed |
| Registry Provider: | Demand Media |
| Type: | Generic |
| Category: | Commerce |
| PIC Submitted: | Download Here |
More information: 
| |
.tours is a proposed TLD in ICANN's New gTLD Program. The applicant is Donuts (Sugar Station, LLC). Google applied for a similar string, .tour.[1]
Application Details[edit | edit source]
Many of Donuts' applications, including this one, seem to have been applied for using the same boiler-plate application in which the TLD is defined as a means of providing greater expression on the Internet and will be an open TLD without pre-registration policies. It notes its plans to adhere with all registration policies required by ICANN and its intent to have remediation and takedown policies clearly defined to fit within these requirements. Pre-registration verification will not be used and this as defined as causing "more harm than benefit by denying domain access to legitimate registrants." They intend to control abuse through "extensive user and rights protections."[2]
String Confusion Objection[edit | edit source]
Google submitted an objection to the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), saying that the .tour and .tours strings would confuse Internet users. Panelist Robert M Nau ruled on the side of Google. This decision will put Donuts, the sole applicant for .tours, into a contention set with Google for the .tour gTLD.[3]
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Reveal Day 13 June 2012 – New gTLD Applied-For Strings
- ↑ ApplicationDetails, gTLDresult.ICANN.orgRetrieved 12 Dec 2012
- ↑ Nau Strikes Again, Google Wins .tours Objection Against Donuts, Domain Name Wire Retrieved 25 Sept 2013