NetBeacon MAP

Revision as of 22:02, 17 May 2024 by Christiane (talk | contribs) (Added content)

NetBeacon Measurement and Analytics Platform (MAP), formerly DNSAI:Compass is NetBeacon Institute initiative to measure and track the use of the DNS for phishing and malware.The goal is to reduce DNS Abuse at the DNS level.[1] It was initially launched in September, 2022. In June, 2023, the Institute announced the addition of a new level of reporting for their measurement project, which they called NetBeacon Measurement and Analytics Platform (MAP).[2]

Collaborations edit

NetBeacon MAP is a collaboration with KOR Labs, led by Dr. Maciej Korczynski. KOR Labs is responsible for collecting the data following an established methodology. This data is then provided to the Institute, that works with PIR’s Data Analytics team to create interactive charts, reports, and individualized dashboards.[1]

Methodology edit

The methodologies employed by KOR Labs to develop DNS Abuse Institute Intelligence reports aim to provide reliable and actionable data on the state of DNS abuse, focusing primarily on phishing and malware. As per 2022, we have the following:

Data Collection and Processing edit

  • URL Blocklists: Utilizes data from reputable sources (APWG, PhishTank, OpenPhish, ABUSE.ch) to gather URLs associated with phishing and malware.
  • Domain Names: Collects domain names from various TLDs using zone files and other measurement methods to ensure a comprehensive list.
  • Technical Registration Information: Gathers registration details using RDAP/WHOIS protocols to identify registrars and gather creation/expiration dates of domains.
  • Uptime Measurements: Measures the time between a domain being blocklisted and the mitigation of the abuse (e.g., removal of malicious content).

Security Metrics edit

  • Occurrence Metrics: Calculates the distribution of abusive domain names and presents data normalized by the size of TLDs or registrars.
  • Persistence Metrics: Measures the persistence of abuse (uptime) to indicate how quickly abuse is mitigated once identified.

Classification of Domains edit

  • Malicious vs. Compromised Domains: Differentiates between domains registered for malicious purposes and benign domains that are compromised. Utilizes a hybrid method combining a machine learning classifier (MalCom) and manual analysis based on mitigation actions.

TLD and Registrar Size Estimation edit

  • Estimates the number of domains under management for each TLD and registrar to normalize the metrics.

Challenges and Limitations edit

  • Acknowledges various challenges in data collection, such as false positives, limitations in WHOIS data, and difficulties in identifying ccTLD registrars.[3]

Reports edit

NetBeacon MAP can can be consumed in three formats:

NetBeacon MAP: Monthly Analysis reports provide detailed tables identifying registrars and TLDs with high and low relative levels of malicious phishing and malware in their domains under management (DUM) and compared to their new monthly registrations.[4] On September 16, 2022, the first report was launched, and focused on higher level aggregate data from May, June, and July 2022. There reports continued monthly.[5] In April, 2024, the Institute launched its twentieth report.

NetBeacon MAP: Charts can be used by registries and registrars to understand how often the DNS is used for phishing and malware, whether abuse is mitigated, how quickly, and the type of registrations (compromised website or maliciously registered domain).[6]

NetBeacon MAP: Dashboards permits registries and registrars to understand, track and benchmark the impact of their efforts to combat DNS Abuse. Accessing one's organizational dashboard helps to understand how much phishing and malware NetBeacon MAP has identified in a particular zone, whether it has been mitigated, and how this compares to one's peers. It's possible to view analysis on whether the domain name was maliciously registered for the purposes of DNS Abuse or is associated with an issue of compromise (typically website compromise). Data can be used to track and measure the prevalence of abuse as well as how changes in one's processes and policies make an impact over time.[7]

References edit