Talk:Stephan Ramoin

I don't want to mess with Ramoin's career history as I have with other pages. While most career sections seem to have little information beyond title, location, date, Ramoin's has a lot of interesting and pertinent info. And while I lean to reading information in reverse chronology, like in most resumes, I could see the argument for keeping it as is- in earliest to present day- as is done on wikipedia.org.. Thoughts? Andrew Merriam

Yes, I'm ok with either order, but think that we should decide and keep it consistent throughout the site. And also when in doubt, [Wikipedia] is a good guide for us. Ray