Changes

Cleaning up the format of Joel's message and adding content guidelines
Line 7: Line 7:  
I also ask that you continue to exercise restraint in your representation of the dispute and the issues involved. ICANNWiki's role is to provide accurate and relevant information to participants and stakeholders. It is not to represent or endorse a particular point of view, nor is it a forum to advertise for a particular side in disputes.
 
I also ask that you continue to exercise restraint in your representation of the dispute and the issues involved. ICANNWiki's role is to provide accurate and relevant information to participants and stakeholders. It is not to represent or endorse a particular point of view, nor is it a forum to advertise for a particular side in disputes.
   −
===
+
== From Joel ==
 
andrew
 
andrew
    
I have sent mail to andrew@icannwiki.org but it bounces. I have no idea if this page is public or private, but given the urgency I will just post a reply to this message here.  I hope that you get this in time. I have also emailed Ray King, fyi, if you want to see the attachments.
 
I have sent mail to andrew@icannwiki.org but it bounces. I have no idea if this page is public or private, but given the urgency I will just post a reply to this message here.  I hope that you get this in time. I have also emailed Ray King, fyi, if you want to see the attachments.
   −
===
   
email sent Dec 4, 2020:
 
email sent Dec 4, 2020:
   Line 40: Line 39:     
Letter being circulated today:
 
Letter being circulated today:
===
  −
         
Have you or anyone you know by chance been involved in talks to buy
 
Have you or anyone you know by chance been involved in talks to buy
  −
      
.网站
 
.网站
  −
  −
  −
  −
  −
      
If so you should know that we are involved in a dispute with Edmon Chung and the holding company for this TLD, which is Namesphere. (With DotAsia as majority partner)
 
If so you should know that we are involved in a dispute with Edmon Chung and the holding company for this TLD, which is Namesphere. (With DotAsia as majority partner)
  −
      
Last year, Edmon surreptitiously sold for $0 (or gave away) the TLD .SPA, also belonging to Namesphere. He did this without the consent of his partners in Namesphere (which would be us).  
 
Last year, Edmon surreptitiously sold for $0 (or gave away) the TLD .SPA, also belonging to Namesphere. He did this without the consent of his partners in Namesphere (which would be us).  
  −
      
He arranged a clandestine meeting of DotAsia on Sept 18, 2019 to approve the giveaway.
 
He arranged a clandestine meeting of DotAsia on Sept 18, 2019 to approve the giveaway.
  −
      
https://www.dot.asia/dotasia-files/board/meeting-minutes/board/DotAsia-BoardMinutes-20190918_FINAL.pdf
 
https://www.dot.asia/dotasia-files/board/meeting-minutes/board/DotAsia-BoardMinutes-20190918_FINAL.pdf
   −
 
+
Then had the ICANN contract sign SPA away on Sept 19, 2019 to a Malaysian company.  
 
  −
Then had the ICANN contract sign SPA away on Sept 19, 2019 to a Malaysian company.  
  −
 
  −
 
      
https://www.icann.org/resources/agreement/spa-2019-09-19-en
 
https://www.icann.org/resources/agreement/spa-2019-09-19-en
  −
  −
  −
      
We did not discover this until sometime in November, when he announced It on the DotAsia website.  Then ensuing lawsuit is here:
 
We did not discover this until sometime in November, when he announced It on the DotAsia website.  Then ensuing lawsuit is here:
  −
      
http://domainincite.com/docs/SPA-Writ-of-Summons-(20201019).pdf
 
http://domainincite.com/docs/SPA-Writ-of-Summons-(20201019).pdf
  −
      
We are also embroiled in another lawsuit with Edmon and DotAsia as they have refused to release our shares in Namesphere (despite having paid for our shares way back in 2012).
 
We are also embroiled in another lawsuit with Edmon and DotAsia as they have refused to release our shares in Namesphere (despite having paid for our shares way back in 2012).
  −
      
Lastly, we are not the only company with this issue, there is also a $2M lawsuit in company naming DotAsia, Edmon Chung, and NS as defendants over BOX.
 
Lastly, we are not the only company with this issue, there is also a $2M lawsuit in company naming DotAsia, Edmon Chung, and NS as defendants over BOX.
  −
      
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cMWDZyAqYCon9YWC8lrkXwN63cpofGTC/view
 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cMWDZyAqYCon9YWC8lrkXwN63cpofGTC/view
  −
  −
  −
      
Should you buy this TLD until this litigation is settled, you may not be able to operate said TLD and be embroiled in some costly litigation (just like the "buyer" of SPA). I would appreciate you coordinating with us if such transaction is taking place.  
 
Should you buy this TLD until this litigation is settled, you may not be able to operate said TLD and be embroiled in some costly litigation (just like the "buyer" of SPA). I would appreciate you coordinating with us if such transaction is taking place.  
  −
  −
  −
      
Apologies if  I have contacted you in error, but Edmon is arranging a Namesphere meeting In less than 24 hours, and as usual, we have not been invited to the table.
 
Apologies if  I have contacted you in error, but Edmon is arranging a Namesphere meeting In less than 24 hours, and as usual, we have not been invited to the table.
  −
      
Regards
 
Regards
Line 122: Line 79:  
+1-818-288-1383
 
+1-818-288-1383
   −
===
+
== Thoughts on editing ICANNWiki ==
 +
Joel,
 +
 
 +
For ICANNWiki content, please keep in mind that the site strives to present information from a Neutral Point of View.  So the fact that there is a legal dispute is fine information to be shown on the site, but it must be presented fairly and without bias.  It should not be the opinion of just one side or the other.  If there is a result from the case, that is fine to document as well.  Secondly, it doesn’t make sense for content to be repeated on the site.  So copying the same exact information and pasting It to multiple page junks up the site and is unnecessary.  Hence we will remove duplicate content and try to show it where it makes most sense.  If there is contentious content, then it is best to cite outside credible references. I hope this makes sense.  [[User:Ray|Ray]] ([[User talk:Ray|talk]])
3,010

edits