| + | * [[Liz Beshudi]] from the [[I&JN]] gave a presentation on the think tank's [https://www.internetjurisdiction.net/domains/toolkit DNS Abuse toolkit]. She discussed legal interoperability, the think tank's three foci, domains, content, and data, the importance of different thresholds for responses to DNS Abuse and understanding the typology of notifiers, and why the EU electronic evidence proposal may affect whois data. |
| + | * [[Graeme Bunton]] presented on developments at the [[DNS Abuse Institute]], which is following the logic that there are two ways to reduce DNS abuse: # prevent it or # react to it. Bunton explained that economic realities indicate that there should be more emphasis on reactive solutions because they don’t have to be integrated into current technology. He also discussed [[CART]], which will include domain look-up, who’s reporting, type of malware/spam, and required information so that registrars can get information about abuse complaints from [[API]] and reporters can go to one place. He hopes it will be new, improved [[DAAR]], non-binary, better, fairer, and more concerned with the persistence than the existence of abuse. |