Changes

Line 49: Line 49:  
After receipt of the IE's final report, the SSAC membership engaged in a self-assessment exercise, resulting in a report to the RWG in June 2009<ref name="wgdraft">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssac-review-wg-draft-report-18sep09-en.pdf SSAC1 - Draft Report of the RWG], September 18, 2009</ref> During [[ICANN 35]] in Sydney, the RWG discussed the final report from JAS as well as the SSAC self-assessment report, and began to formulate proposals for the implementation of improvements recommended in each report.<ref name="wgdraft" />  
 
After receipt of the IE's final report, the SSAC membership engaged in a self-assessment exercise, resulting in a report to the RWG in June 2009<ref name="wgdraft">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssac-review-wg-draft-report-18sep09-en.pdf SSAC1 - Draft Report of the RWG], September 18, 2009</ref> During [[ICANN 35]] in Sydney, the RWG discussed the final report from JAS as well as the SSAC self-assessment report, and began to formulate proposals for the implementation of improvements recommended in each report.<ref name="wgdraft" />  
    +
===Draft Report===
 
In its draft report, the RWG collated the IE's recommendations, the SSAC's response, and the working group's consensus opinion on each recommendation from the IE's final report, as well as the additional recommendations from the SSAC Self-Assessment:
 
In its draft report, the RWG collated the IE's recommendations, the SSAC's response, and the working group's consensus opinion on each recommendation from the IE's final report, as well as the additional recommendations from the SSAC Self-Assessment:
 
{| class="wikitable"  
 
{| class="wikitable"  
Line 222: Line 223:  
| WG agrees
 
| WG agrees
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
===Public Comment on RWG Draft Report===
 +
The RWG presented its draft report at [[ICANN 36]] in Seoul.<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/seoul2009/node/7098.html ICANN 36 Archive - SSAC Review - Presentation of the Draft Report of the RWG], October 28, 2009</ref> [[Dennis Jennings]], chair  of the RWG, took the audience through the recommendations presented above.<ref>[https://archive.icann.org/en/meetings/seoul2009/bitcache/Review%20of%20the%20SSAC%20-%20SSAC%20Review%20WG%20%C3%A2__%20Presentation%20of%20the%20Draft%20Report-vid=7453&disposition=attachment&op=download.pdf Presentation Slides - Draft Report of the RWG], October 28, 2009</ref>
 +
 +
The draft report was also published for written comments.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/ssac-review-2009-2009-10-05-en Public Comment Proceeding - SSAC1 Review Working Group Draft Report], October 5, 2009</ref> One comment was submitted via email. [[John Curran]] noted that the SSAC's position on Recommendation 6 was correct, and that it was important for SSAC's charter to reflect its ability to engage with and advise on ICANN's internal operations and processes.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/ssac-review-2009/msg00000.html SSAC1 Listserv Archive - John Curran's comment on the Draft Report of RWG], October 28, 2009</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits