Changes

|  

|  

|  

|  

| Ombudsman advised the committee that this request was no different from a complaint to the Ombuds office. Deemed frivolous.

| [[Ombudsman]] advised the committee that this request was no different from a complaint to the Ombuds office. Deemed frivolous.

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/06-1-2014-02-07-en 06-1:] [[Network Solutions]], LLC, et. al.

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/06-1-2014-02-07-en 06-1:] [[Network Solutions]], LLC, et. al.

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/06-3-2014-02-07-en 06-3:] [[Marilyn Cade]]

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/06-3-2014-02-07-en 06-3:] [[Marilyn Cade]]

| Protesting ICANN GC decision that she could not run in a mid-term election for a vacated board seat. Cade resigned from the [[NomCom]] in order to run for the seat.

| Protesting ICANN [[Board Committees|Governance Committee]] decision that she could not run in a mid-term election for a vacated board seat. Cade resigned from the [[NomCom]] in order to run for the seat.

| No*

| No*

| Deny

| Deny

| Bylaws are "unambiguous" regarding former [[NomCom]] members' eligibility to be selected for board service; requestor fails to state a claim that would be subject to reconsideration

| Bylaws are "unambiguous" regarding former [[NomCom]] members' eligibility to be selected for board service; requestor fails to state a claim that would be subject to reconsideration

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/06-4-2014-02-07-en 06-4:] ICM Registry

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/06-4-2014-02-07-en 06-4:] [[ICM Registry]]

| Board rejection of Registry Agreement with ICM for [[.xxx]]

| Board rejection of Registry Agreement with ICM for [[.xxx]]

| No

| No

|  

|  

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/10-1-2014-02-07-en 10-1:] Michael Palage

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/10-1-2014-02-07-en 10-1:] [[Michael Palage]]

| Late publication of board meeting minutes

| Late publication of board meeting minutes

| No

| No

| Posting was 10 hours late, so limited impact; but, recommend amendment of Bylaws requiring posting of board resolutions within 2 days, and preliminary report within 7 days.

| Posting was 10 hours late, so limited impact; but, recommend amendment of [[ICANN Bylaws]] requiring the posting of board resolutions within 2 days, and preliminary report within 7 days.

| [https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-25jun10-en.htm#14 Approved recommendation]

| [https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-25jun10-en.htm#14 Approved recommendation]

| Palage, in the public comments to the proposed Bylaws amendment, expressed [https://forum.icann.org/lists/reconsideration-request-10-1/msg00004.html disappointment]

| Palage, in the [[Public Comment]]s to the proposed Bylaws amendment, expressed [https://forum.icann.org/lists/reconsideration-request-10-1/msg00004.html disappointment]

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/10-2-2014-02-07-en 10-2:] [[.JOBS]] Charter Compliance Coalition

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/10-2-2014-02-07-en 10-2:] [[.jobs]] Charter Compliance Coalition

| Approval of amendments to [[.JOBS]] [[Registry Agreement]], permitting noncompanyname.jobs registrations & proposing a phased allocation of such names

| Approval of amendments to .JOBS [[Registry Agreement]], permitting noncompanyname.jobs registrations & proposing a phased allocation of such names

| No

| No

| Deny, but ICANN staff to closely monitor the rollout of these new names to ensure the registry complies with its charter

| Deny, but [[ICANN Organization|ICANN staff]] to closely monitor the rollout of these new names to ensure the registry complies with its charter

| [https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#8 Approved recommendation]

| [https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-10dec10-en.htm#8 Approved recommendation]

| "…the BGC is not at all clear that it has a full picture of how [[Employ Media]] intends to implement the Phased Allocation Process.""<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf BGC Recommendation on RR 10-2], December 9, 2010</ref>

| "…the [[BGC|Board Governance Committee]] is not at all clear that it has a full picture of how [[Employ Media]] intends to implement the Phased Allocation Process.""<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf BGC Recommendation on RR 10-2], December 9, 2010</ref>

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/10-3-2014-02-07-en 10-3:] Michael Palage

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/10-3-2014-02-07-en 10-3:] [[Michael Palage]]

| Resolution approving description of High Security Top Level Domain program in the [[Applicant Guidebook]]

| Resolution approving description of [[HSTLD|High-Security Top Level Domain]] program in the [[Applicant Guidebook]]

| No*

| No*

| Deny

| Deny

| No support for reconsideration based on the grounds listed in the Bylaws. BGC found that "Information that is not yet in existence cannot be considered “material information” for the purposes of the Reconsideration process.""<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-04dec10-en.pdf BGC Recommendation on RR 10-3], December 4, 2010</ref>

| No support for reconsideration based on the grounds listed in the Bylaws. BGC found that "Information that is not yet in existence cannot be considered “material information” for the purposes of the Reconsideration process.""<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-04dec10-en.pdf BGC Recommendation on RR 10-3], December 4, 2010</ref>

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/11-1-2014-02-07-en 11-1:] Michael Gende

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/11-1-2014-02-07-en 11-1:] [[Michael Gende]]

| Staff failure to assist Mr. Gende in obtaining zetamusic.com

| Staff failure to assist Mr. Gende in obtaining zetamusic.com

| No*

| No*

| Failure to state a claim related to ICANN's mission.

| Failure to state a claim related to ICANN's mission.

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/12-1-2014-02-07-en 12-1:] International Olympic Committee

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/12-1-2014-02-07-en 12-1:] [[International Olympic Committee]]

| New gTLD Committee's inaction re: advice from [[GNSO]] suggesting additional protections for Red Cross, IOC

| New gTLD Committee's inaction re: advice from [[GNSO]] suggesting [[Protection of IGO and INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs Policy|additional protections for Red Cross, IOC]]

| No

| No

| Deny; but, suggest that the New gTLD committee assess whether the time is now ripe to act on GNSO advice

| Deny; but, suggest that the [[Board Committees|New gTLD Committee]] assess whether the time is now ripe to act on GNSO advice

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2012-06-27-en New gTLD Committee resolved to review new information since original decision]

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2012-06-27-en New gTLD Committee resolved to review new information since original decision]

|  

|  

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/12-2-2014-02-07-en 12-2:] GNSO [[Intellectual Property Constituency]]

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/12-2-2014-02-07-en 12-2:] [[GNSO]] [[Intellectual Property Constituency]]

| Board Approval of the Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) request of the registry operator for .CAT, Fundació PuntCAT

| Board Approval of the Registry Services Evaluation Process ([[RSEP]]) request of the registry operator for [[.cat]], [[PuntCAT|Fundació PuntCAT]]

| No

| No

| Deny; but amend a preliminary "wheras" clause from the resolution to avoid confusion regarding scope of the amendment

| Deny; but amend a preliminary "whereas" clause from the resolution to avoid confusion regarding the scope of the amendment

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2012-08-28-en#2.a Deny reconsideration, amend "whereas" clause as recommended

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2012-08-28-en#2.a Deny reconsideration, amend "whereas" clause as recommended

| Request for amendment was related to GDPR/WHOIS issues for a Spanish registry

| Request for amendment was related to [[GDPR]]/[[WHOIS]] issues for a Spanish registry

|-

|-

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-1-2014-02-07-en 13-1:] [[Ummah Digital, Ltd.]]

| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/13-1-2014-02-07-en 13-1:] [[Ummah Digital, Ltd.]]

| Staff rejection of Ummah's application based on Support Applicant Review Panel's Findings under the [[New gTLD Round]]

| Staff rejection of [[.ummah|Ummah]]'s application based on [https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/candidate-support Support Applicant Review Panel]'s Findings under the [[New gTLD Round]]

| No

| No

| Deny; refer to [[SUBPRO]] for possible lessons learned

| Deny; refer to [[SUBPRO]] for possible lessons learned

| Denied and referred to SUBPRO

| Denied and referred to [[SUBPRO]]

| "ICANN’s accountability mechanisms are not intended for instances where a requestor: (1) is fully aware of the potential risks and defined outcomes within a process; (2) chooses to participate within that process; and (3) when they experience an unfavorable but defined outcome, seeks relief from that outcome."

| "ICANN’s accountability mechanisms are not intended for instances where a requestor: (1) is fully aware of the potential risks and defined outcomes within a process; (2) chooses to participate within that process; and (3) when they experience an unfavorable but defined outcome, seeks relief from that outcome."

|-

|-