Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| #* The initial report concerning inter-transfers (changes in registrars) to be published Q2 of 2022; at ICANN 74, the focus will focus on intra-transfers: change of registrants. | | #* The initial report concerning inter-transfers (changes in registrars) to be published Q2 of 2022; at ICANN 74, the focus will focus on intra-transfers: change of registrants. |
| # The [[Prioritization Framework]] pilot was also a topic during Prep Week in the Planning & Finance Update Session.<ref name="preppf">[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/eoKAM7x4Rh2bf9z34 ICANN 74 Archive - Planning & Finance Update], June 1, 2022</ref> Participants in the pilot process praised the efficiency and work product of the pilot.<ref name="preppf" /> [[Xavier Calvez]] clarified that, in principle, recommendations and policy objectives would only go through the prioritization framework one time.<ref name="preppf" /> | | # The [[Prioritization Framework]] pilot was also a topic during Prep Week in the Planning & Finance Update Session.<ref name="preppf">[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/eoKAM7x4Rh2bf9z34 ICANN 74 Archive - Planning & Finance Update], June 1, 2022</ref> Participants in the pilot process praised the efficiency and work product of the pilot.<ref name="preppf" /> [[Xavier Calvez]] clarified that, in principle, recommendations and policy objectives would only go through the prioritization framework one time.<ref name="preppf" /> |
− |
| |
| # Updates and details from the [[SUBPRO]] Operational Design Phase were also shared and discussed during Prep Week.<ref>[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/ZwGFKyDZpR69khesm ICANN 74 Archive - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures ODP Update], May 31, 2022</ref> | | # Updates and details from the [[SUBPRO]] Operational Design Phase were also shared and discussed during Prep Week.<ref>[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/ZwGFKyDZpR69khesm ICANN 74 Archive - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures ODP Update], May 31, 2022</ref> |
| #* special focus on possibly updating the rules on Application Change Requests (ACRs) to resolve contention sets, lengthening the objection period, determining the interest/potential volume of applications, and outlining how long the ODP process may take (10 months), followed with a 3-month allowance for the [[ICANN Board]] to consider the ODA | | #* special focus on possibly updating the rules on Application Change Requests (ACRs) to resolve contention sets, lengthening the objection period, determining the interest/potential volume of applications, and outlining how long the ODP process may take (10 months), followed with a 3-month allowance for the [[ICANN Board]] to consider the ODA |
| # [[DNS Abuse]] persisted as a salient topic; the [[GNSO]]'s small team on DNS Abuse was optimistic about its work and said that it had received a lot of input from across the community and generated many fresh ideas on tackling the issue | | # [[DNS Abuse]] persisted as a salient topic; the [[GNSO]]'s small team on DNS Abuse was optimistic about its work and said that it had received a lot of input from across the community and generated many fresh ideas on tackling the issue |
| # The session on ICANN's [[Evolution of the Multistakeholder Model]] involved several participant polls, which reflected an interest in ICANN improving inclusivity, accountability, and the culture (moving away from silos) | | # The session on ICANN's [[Evolution of the Multistakeholder Model]] involved several participant polls, which reflected an interest in ICANN improving inclusivity, accountability, and the culture (moving away from silos) |
| + | |
| ===Policy Forum=== | | ===Policy Forum=== |
| # DNS Abuse: | | # DNS Abuse: |