Changes

Line 40: Line 40:     
Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected as other applicants would have withdrawn already, and the new gTLD would be left without an owner. The former model also lumped all TLDs that an individual applicant had applied for in one package. Criticisms stating that such a model would benefit larger companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.<ref name="domainincite"></ref>
 
Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected as other applicants would have withdrawn already, and the new gTLD would be left without an owner. The former model also lumped all TLDs that an individual applicant had applied for in one package. Criticisms stating that such a model would benefit larger companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.<ref name="domainincite"></ref>
 +
 +
Cramton and Associates have secured their fees at 1% for the first round, with a floor of $1 million USD and a ceiling of $4.5 million.
 +
 
===Right of the Dot===
 
===Right of the Dot===
 
An ascending clock model is offered by [[Right of the Dot]], though it also has proposed "sealed bid" and "live auction" models. One of its overall goals is to offer applicants "flexibility", and cater to the "desires of the participants".<ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130102_private_vs_icann_auction_of_last_resort/ Comments by Mike Berkens, Private vs. ICANN Auction of Last Resort, CircleID.com]Posted jan 2 2013, Retrieved Jan 7 2013</ref>  In a sealed bid model, applicants securely send money via a courier and packages are stored in a safe place until they are opened at the auction session.<ref name="worldipreview"></ref>
 
An ascending clock model is offered by [[Right of the Dot]], though it also has proposed "sealed bid" and "live auction" models. One of its overall goals is to offer applicants "flexibility", and cater to the "desires of the participants".<ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130102_private_vs_icann_auction_of_last_resort/ Comments by Mike Berkens, Private vs. ICANN Auction of Last Resort, CircleID.com]Posted jan 2 2013, Retrieved Jan 7 2013</ref>  In a sealed bid model, applicants securely send money via a courier and packages are stored in a safe place until they are opened at the auction session.<ref name="worldipreview"></ref>