Talk:Stephan Ramoin

I don't want to mess with Ramoin's career history as I have with other pages. While most career sections seem to have little information beyond title, location, date, Ramoin's has a lot of interesting and pertinent info. And while I lean to reading information in reverse chronology, like in most resumes, I could see the argument for keeping it as is- in earliest to present day- as is done on wikipedia.org.. Thoughts? Andrew Merriam

Yes, I'm ok with either order, but think that we should decide and keep it consistent throughout the site. And also when in doubt, Wikipedia is a good guide for us. Ray