Changes

===ICANN's Response to .JOBS Charter Coalition Petition===

===ICANN's Response to .JOBS Charter Coalition Petition===

ICANN's [[Board Governance Committee]] (BGC) evaluated the petition submitted by the .JOBS Charter Coalition regarding the Phase Allocation Program. On October 12, 2010, the BGC determined that the allegations of the coalition has no merit and cited the following reasons:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/tap/2010-12-10+Response+to+Reconsideration+Request+10-2 2010-12-10 Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

ICANN's [[Board Governance Committee]] (BGC) evaluated the petition submitted by the .JOBS Charter Coalition regarding the Phase Allocation Program. A set of questions was sent to the Society of Human Resources Management (SHRM) in connection with the reconsideration request filed by the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-questions-to-shrm-04nov10-en.pdf Questions for Society of Human Resources Management Regarding Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

 

On October 12, 2010, the BGC determined that the allegations of the coalition has no merit and cited the following reasons:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/tap/2010-12-10+Response+to+Reconsideration+Request+10-2 2010-12-10 Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

* The concerns of the coalition regarding the potential violation of the .jobs charter regarding the implementation of the Phase Allocation Program is not a proper ground for the ICANN Board to reconsider its decision.

* The concerns of the coalition regarding the potential violation of the .jobs charter regarding the implementation of the Phase Allocation Program is not a proper ground for the ICANN Board to reconsider its decision.

* The ICANN Board did not fail to consider material information available at the time of action.

* The ICANN Board did not fail to consider material information available at the time of action.