Changes

==ICANN's Response to .JOBS Charter Coalition Petition==

==ICANN's Response to .JOBS Charter Coalition Petition==

ICANN's [[Board Governance Committee]] (BGC) evaluated the petition submitted by the .JOBS Charter Coalition regarding the Phase Allocation Program. A set of questions was sent to the Society of Human Resources Management (SHRM) in connection with the reconsideration request filed by the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-questions-to-shrm-04nov10-en.pdf Questions for Society of Human Resources Management Regarding Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

ICANN's [[Board Governance Committee]] (BGC) evaluated the petition submitted by the .JOBS Charter Coalition regarding the Phased Allocation Program. A set of questions was sent to the Society of Human Resources Management (SHRM) in connection with the reconsideration request filed by the .JOBS Charter Compliance Coalition.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-questions-to-shrm-04nov10-en.pdf Questions for Society of Human Resources Management Regarding Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

On October 12, 2010, the BGC determined that the allegations of the coalition has no merit and cited the following reasons:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/tap/2010-12-10+Response+to+Reconsideration+Request+10-2 2010-12-10 Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

On October 12, 2010, the BGC determined that the allegations of the coalition has no merit and cited the following reasons:<ref>[https://community.icann.org/display/tap/2010-12-10+Response+to+Reconsideration+Request+10-2 2010-12-10 Response to Reconsideration Request 10-2]</ref>

In addition, the BGC recommended the ICANN Board to closely monitor Employ Media's compliance with the charter, to direct the [[ICANN CEO]] to create a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider the issue and evaluate if a policy development process ([[PDP]]) is necessary.

In addition, the BGC recommended the ICANN Board to closely monitor Employ Media's compliance with the charter, to direct the [[ICANN CEO]] to create a briefing paper for the GNSO to consider the issue and evaluate if a policy development process ([[PDP]]) is necessary.

During the ICANN meeting in Cartagena on December 9, 2010, the ICANN Board's BGC refused to change its decision in August regarding the approval of the.jobs Phase Allocation Program despite the persistent petition from .JOBS Charter Coalition. However, the BGC recommended that "the Board direct the CEO, and General Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its Charter. ICANN's decision allowed Employ Media  continue its RFP process, to auction and allocate premium domain names to its partners.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf Recommendation Of The Board Governance Committee, Reconsideration Request 10-2, 9 December 2010]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/did-jobs-win-or-lose-in-cartagena/ Did .jobs win or lose in Cartagena?]</ref>

During the ICANN meeting in Cartagena on December 9, 2010, the ICANN Board's BGC refused to change its decision in August regarding the approval of the.jobs Phased Allocation Program despite the persistent petition from .JOBS Charter Coalition. However, the BGC recommended that "the Board direct the CEO, and General Counsel and Secretary, to ensure that ICANN’s Contractual Compliance Department closely monitor Employ Media’s compliance with its Charter. ICANN's decision allowed Employ Media  continue its RFP process, to auction and allocate premium domain names to its partners.<ref>[http://archive.icann.org/en/committees/reconsideration/bgc-recommendation-09dec10-en.pdf Recommendation Of The Board Governance Committee, Reconsideration Request 10-2, 9 December 2010]</ref> <ref>[http://domainincite.com/did-jobs-win-or-lose-in-cartagena/ Did .jobs win or lose in Cartagena?]</ref>

==.JOBS Universe==

==.JOBS Universe==