14,932
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 127:
Line 127: + + − + − ===Working Groups===+ − ====the Future of Multistakeholderism====+ − ====the Globalization of ICANN==== + − ====Global Internet: the User Perspective====+ − ====ICANN Transparency and Accountability==== + − ====At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN====+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
# Implement proposals from 2005 Hijacking report
# Implement proposals from 2005 Hijacking report
|}
|}
With every ATLAS, there is an increasing formalization of ideas, recommendations, and procedures, all toward the aim of fostering concrete results. One of the key outcomes of Atlas I was the lesson that the community needs to document, delegate, and follow-up on many tasks along the way to ensure that the ICANN Board, as well as other ICANN entities, including ALAC, acknowledge and explain whether they are implementing the recommendations or not.
==ATLAS II==
==ATLAS II==
ATLAS II was held in London in conjunction with [[ICANN 50]]. The summit brought together representatives from [[At-Large Structure]]s to debate ICANN policies, share information, and experience an ICANN meeting. The attendees represented Internet end users, and many had never experienced an ICANN meeting before. The goal of the meeting was to reach consensus and draft reports on five issues.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/blog/at-large-community-to-convene-in-london-for-atlas-ii At-Large Community to Convene in London for ATLAS II] ''ICANN.org''; Retrieved 10 July 2014</ref>
ATLAS II was held in London in conjunction with [[ICANN 50]]. The summit brought together representatives from [[At-Large Structure]]s to debate ICANN policies, share information, and experience an ICANN meeting. The attendees represented Internet end users, and many had never experienced an ICANN meeting before. As with ATLAS I, the goal of the meeting was to reach consensus and draft reports on what the At-Large Community had decided were the five most urgent issues.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/news/blog/at-large-community-to-convene-in-london-for-atlas-ii At-Large Community to Convene in London for ATLAS II] ''ICANN.org''; Retrieved 10 July 2014</ref>
The Second At-Large Summit (ATLAS II) took place after the Board approved a special budget for the event. The summit resulted in the [https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/9735 ATLAS II Declaration], which the then Chair of the [[ALAC]] [[Olivier Crépin-Leblond]] sent to the then Chair of the [[ICANN Board]] [[Steve Crocker]] on August 7, 2014.
The Declaration was the result of contributions of representatives from 150 [[At-Large Structure]]s from 70 countries who met face to face in London in June 2014.
The Declaration includes 43 recommendations for the ICANN Board, ICANN, and the ALAC, 10 observations for the wider Internet community, and rationales from the five ATLAS II thematic working groups for the recommendations and observations.
The thematic groups included:
# Future of Multi-Stakeholder Models
# The Globalization of ICANN
# Global Internet: The User Perspective
# ICANN Transparency and Accountability
# At-Large Community Engagement in ICANN
In August 2014, the ATLAS II Implementation Taskforce was established, with members
consisting of organizers of the ATLAS II, drafters of the Declaration, and leaders in the At-Large Community. The taskforce led the transformation of each
recommendation into concrete actions as carried out by At-Large assignees, who ensured that the concrete action recommendations reached ICANN Staff, the ICANN
Board, and/or ALAC.
Last updated on Jul 29, 2019, a thumbnail table of the 43 recommendations, their recipients, assignees, and completion status showed that of the 22 recommendations to the board, 18 had been “completed,” one had been “discarded,” and 3 were still “in progress.” A completed recommendation means it has been transformed into concrete actions and a milestone has been reached.
Over 40% of the recommendations to the Board concerned the dual item of IANA Transition & ICANN Accountability. Meanwhile, the recommendations to the ALAC focused on raising the level of involvement and representation of At-Large Community members in ICANN. This overarching goal encompassed the following objectives, most of which have reached a milestone and have been marked as “completed”:
#simplify and clarify ICANN for Internet users so they can actually be part of the multistakeholder model
#find new and better ways of incorporating Internet users into the policy development process
#make more and better use of the people and structures that are already involved in the At-Large Community, through RALO surveys and more frequent and a wider variety of modes of communication within the community
#periodically assess the multistakeholder model to gauge whether the At-Large Community is represented and their needs met (reduce conflicts between ICANN requirements and national laws; expand the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman, who along with Contractual Compliance, should publish all complaints proceedings.
Finally, the Post ATLAS II Implementation Taskforce generated a list of
Lessons Learned
# one champion for each recommendation
# the champion can be a chair, subject matter expert, moderator/assistant moderator, reporter/assistant reporter of the thematic group that generates the recommendation. If the champion becomes incapable of fulfilling the duties, then the entire thematic group must complete the tasks.
#The thematic groups must prepare, reconvene, provide status updates on implementation and feedback, and continue assigning tasks to move the recommendation forward
# a template for ATLAS recommendations is needed; it should explain the context, to whom it is allocated, and the specifics
#recommendations should be processed on a yearly basis
==ATLAS III==
==ATLAS III==
==References==
==References==