Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
19 bytes removed ,  11 years ago
no edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:  
BITS has been vocal about what it deems as mandatory secuirty measure for any financially related gTLD. There are no specific measures stipulated in [[ICANN]]'s [[Applicant Guidebook]]. BITS' [[Security Standards Working Group]] has made its own set of suggestions to ICANN on such requirements.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/high-security-bank-spec-published/ High Security Bank Spec Published, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
 
BITS has been vocal about what it deems as mandatory secuirty measure for any financially related gTLD. There are no specific measures stipulated in [[ICANN]]'s [[Applicant Guidebook]]. BITS' [[Security Standards Working Group]] has made its own set of suggestions to ICANN on such requirements.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/high-security-bank-spec-published/ High Security Bank Spec Published, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
   −
==External Links==
   
* [http://www.bits.org/publications/ICANNletters.php BITS Comment Letters to ICANN]
 
* [http://www.bits.org/publications/ICANNletters.php BITS Comment Letters to ICANN]
  

Navigation menu