3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 696:
Line 696: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Documentary Information Disclosure Policy (view source)
Revision as of 01:17, 29 January 2022
, 2 years ago→Summary Tables of DIDP Requests & Responses
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, & 12
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, & 12
| In addition to the broad number of reasons why such a request was impossible to fulfill, no such document existed.
| In addition to the broad number of reasons why such a request was impossible to fulfill, no such document existed.
|-
| 10 September 2015
| Mark Seiden
| Documents recording security incidents reported to ICANN during 2013, 2014, 2015 to date under section 3.20 (iii) of the [[Registry Accreditation Agreement]]
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-20150910-1-mark-seiden-10oct15-en.pdf Declined]
| 5 & 6
| Response noted that Seiden's work on the [[SSAC]] was the reason for the request, and expressed hope that the SSAC's efforts to arrange anonymized reports re: security information would meet with success
|-
| 10 September 2015
| Asia Green IT System Ltd.
| Documents related to the New gTLD Program Committee's decision to reject Asia Green's applications for [[.halal]] and [[.islam]], based on [[GAC]] advice, community objections, and other context. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-request-20150910-1-asia-green-it-system-ltd-10sep15-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-attachment-20150910-1-asia-green-it-system-ltd-10oct15-en.pdf Provided a single letter] written by Steve Crocker, which had inadvertently not been published on ICANN's correspondence page. Otherwise denied.
| 1, 2, 3, 8, & 9
| Response pointed to copious amounts of publicly available information on the NGPC's deliberations, communications with the GAC and other objections, and other relevant documents.
|-
| 18 September 2015
| American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
| Information related to the determination that the Institute did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.cpa]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-request-20150918-2-18sep15-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-supporting-20150918-2-18oct15-en.pdf Provided the email] that approved the initiation of the CPE, but otherwise declined to produce documents
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
|
|-
| 18 September 2015
| CPA Australia
| Information related to the determination that CPA Australia did not prevail in its [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.cpa]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-request-20150918-1-18sep15-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-response-supporting-20150918-1-18oct15-en.pdf Provided an email] approving initiation of CPE process, otherwised declined to produce documents
| 2, 3, 6, & 9
| Very similar request as the Am. Inst. of CPAs
|-
| 21 September 2015
| [[Don Moody]], on behalf of [[Donuts, Inc.]] and its subsidiary Foggy Sunset, LLC
| Information related to the determination approving Asia Spa & Wellness Promotion Council's [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.spa]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20150921-1-moody-request-redacted-21sep15-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20150921-1-moody-response-supporting-docs-21oct15-en.pdf Provided the email] that initiated the CPE process, as well as the one public comment on the Community Evaluation forum that was received in relation to the [[.spa]] CPE; otherwise declined to produce documents
| 2, 3, 5, 6, & 9
| Response noted that the DIDP request identified most of the publicly available information regarding the CPE.
|-
| 22 October 2015
| Bart Lieben on behalf of dotgay LLC
| Information regarding the determination that dotgay LLC did not prevail in its second [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.gay]]. [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20151022-1-lieben-request-redacted-22oct15-en.pdf Full request].
| [https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/didp-20151022-1-lieben-response-supporting-docs-21nov15-en.pdf Provided email exchanges] between ICANN staff and the third party CPE evaluator regarding the completeness of the record at the initiation of the second CPE; otherwise declined to produce documents
| 2, 3, 8, 9, & 12
|
|}
|}
==References==
==References==