Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 45: Line 45:  
<blockquote>The Public Comments demonstrated strong concerns, particularly amongst individual commentators, regarding the EPDP team’s proposal to exempt IGO Complainants from the requirement to agree to submit to a Mutual Jurisdiction, to the extent that it would result in limitations on the registrant’s ability to file court proceedings against an IGO or in compelling a registrant to go to arbitration. These commentators emphasized that the outcomes of the EPDP should not reduce or otherwise adversely affect the rights of registrants<ref name="finalrep"</blockquote>
 
<blockquote>The Public Comments demonstrated strong concerns, particularly amongst individual commentators, regarding the EPDP team’s proposal to exempt IGO Complainants from the requirement to agree to submit to a Mutual Jurisdiction, to the extent that it would result in limitations on the registrant’s ability to file court proceedings against an IGO or in compelling a registrant to go to arbitration. These commentators emphasized that the outcomes of the EPDP should not reduce or otherwise adversely affect the rights of registrants<ref name="finalrep"</blockquote>
 
The arbitration procedure was intended to provide recourse for registrants without requiring IGOs to submit to the jurisdiction of specific courts.
 
The arbitration procedure was intended to provide recourse for registrants without requiring IGOs to submit to the jurisdiction of specific courts.
 +
 +
At [[ICANN 74]], the GNSO Council approved the final report and its recommendations.<ref>[https://74.schedule.icann.org/meetings/H2wGoiw8J8Lv7u6z8 ICANN 74 Archive - GNSO Council Meeting], June 15, 2022</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits

Navigation menu