3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 12:
Line 48: + + + Line 34:
Line 73: − + + + + + + + + + + +
First Accountability and Transparency Review (view source)
Revision as of 17:52, 6 October 2021
, 2 years agono edit summary
The '''First Accountability and Transparency Review''' (ATRT1) was conducted between 2010 and 2011, with implementation of recommendations from the review stretching into 2013.<ref name="dashboard">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/atrt1-progress-milestones-2019-08-06-en ICANN.org - ATRT1 Dashboard], last updated August 6, 2019</ref>
The '''First Accountability and Transparency Review''' (ATRT1) was conducted between 2010 and 2011, with implementation of recommendations from the review stretching into 2013.<ref name="dashboard">[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/atrt1-progress-milestones-2019-08-06-en ICANN.org - ATRT1 Dashboard], last updated August 6, 2019</ref>
<timeline>
# All measures are in pixels
ImageSize = width:800 height:300
PlotArea = left:50 right:50 bottom:20 top:20
AlignBars = early
DateFormat = mm/dd/yyyy
Period = from:01/01/2010 till:03/01/2013
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:1 start:01/01/2010
ScaleMinor = unit:month increment:1 gridcolor:skyblue start:01/01/2010
Define $dx = 25
BarData=
Barset:Phases
PlotData=
align:left textcolor:black fontsize:M mark:(line,black) width:15
barset:Phases color:yellowgreen
from:01/13/2010 till:05/18/2010 shift:(42,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/call-for-applicants-11jan10-en.pdf|Initiation of Review]
from:05/18/2010 till:08/10/2010 shift:(28,-5) text:[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-questions-2010/pdfW0ZU92FBG5.pdf|Initial Public Comments]
from:06/02/2010 till:08/10/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2010-06-02-en|RFP for Independent Expert]
from:08/10/2010 till:10/20/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-recommendations-20oct10-en.pdf|Drafting Proposed Recommendations]
at:10/20/2010 shift:(2,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/review-berkman-final-report-20oct10-en.pdf|Expert Report Released]
from:10/20/2010 till:12/15/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-draft-proposed-recommendations/pdf2AXdrMUJSL.pdf|Public Comment on Proposed Recommendations]
from:12/15/2010 till:12/31/2010 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf|Final Recommendations]
from:12/31/2010 till:03/08/2011 shift:($dx,-5) text:[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-final-recommendations/pdfhL3msytNxe.pdf|Public Comment on Final Recommendations]
at:01/25/2011 shift:(2,-5) text:"[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-2011-01-25-en#10|Board Accepts Report & Requests Implementation Plan]"
from:01/25/2011 till:06/24/2011 shift:(47,-5) text:"[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2011-06-24-en#2|Implementation Planning & Board Approval]"
from:06/24/2011 till:01/29/2013 align:center shift:(0,-5) text:"Implementation Phase"
</timeline>
==Background==
==Background==
===Origin and Purpose of Specific Reviews===
The [[Affirmation of Commitments]], an agreement between ICANN and the [[United States Department of Commerce]], establishes ICANN's obligations to perform its duties with specific commitments in mind. All of the commitments bear on public and consumer trust of the organization. ICANN is to perform its functions in a manner that:
The [[Affirmation of Commitments]], an agreement between ICANN and the [[United States Department of Commerce]], establishes ICANN's obligations to perform its duties with specific commitments in mind. All of the commitments bear on public and consumer trust of the organization. ICANN is to perform its functions in a manner that:
*ensures accountability and transparency of decision-making;
*ensures accountability and transparency of decision-making;
The [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] of the board oversees the conduct of specific reviews.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en ICANN.org - Organizational Effectiveness Committee]</ref> The ATRT is one such specific review.
The [[Organizational Effectiveness Committee]] of the board oversees the conduct of specific reviews.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/organizational-effectiveness-committee-2014-03-21-en ICANN.org - Organizational Effectiveness Committee]</ref> The ATRT is one such specific review.
===ATRT1 Team===
ATRT1 was composed of volunteer members: 1 from both the ASO and ALAC; 2 from the ccNSO; 4 from the GNSO; 4 from governments (including 2 ex-officio members); the chair of the ICANN Board; and 1 or 2 independent experts. The GAC's representatives to the ATRT included [[Manal Ismail]], an ex-officio member who is the designated nominee of former GAC chairman [[Janis Karklins]] and serves as vice-chair of ATRT1, [[Fabio Colossanti]] from the EU and [[Xinsheng Zhang]] from China.
==ATRT1 Process and Findings==
==ATRT1 Process and Findings==
Fifteen total comments, from thirteen commenters, were received on the draft recommendations.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-draft-proposed-recommendations/pdf2AXdrMUJSL.pdf Summary of Public Comments], December 15, 2010</ref>
Fifteen total comments, from thirteen commenters, were received on the draft recommendations.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-draft-proposed-recommendations/pdf2AXdrMUJSL.pdf Summary of Public Comments], December 15, 2010</ref>
==Final Recommendations and Implementation==
==Final Report and Implementation==
The review team submitted its final report to the ICANN Board on December 31, 2010.<ref name="finalreport">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf ATRT1 - Final Recommendations], December 31, 2010</ref> The report included twenty-seven recommendations, mainly divided across the four topic areas described above.<ref name="finalreport" /> The report was also submitted for public comment, and received a total of ten substantive comments.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-final-recommendations/pdfhL3msytNxe.pdf Summary Report on Public Comment Process], March 8, 2011</ref>
The review team submitted its final report to the ICANN Board on December 31, 2010.<ref name="finalreport">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf ATRT1 - Final Recommendations], December 31, 2010</ref> The report included twenty-seven recommendations, mainly divided across the four topic areas described above.<ref name="finalreport" /> The report was also submitted for public comment, and received a total of ten substantive comments.<ref>[https://forum.icann.org/lists/atrt-final-recommendations/pdfhL3msytNxe.pdf Summary Report on Public Comment Process], March 8, 2011</ref>
Regarding the GAC's role, effectiveness, and interaction with the Board, the ATRT recommended the following:
* The GAC-Board Joint Working Group needs to clarify what constitutes GAC public policy "advice" under the Bylaws.
* After establishing the formal context of GAC public policy "advice," the ICANN Board should develop a more formal documented process to notify and request GAC advice regarding public policy issues.
* ICANN should be proactive in requesting GAC advice in writing. Documentation of requests should be housed in a database, including the request and all advice received by ICANN from the GAC.
* The Board and GAC should work together to ensure that GAC advice is provided and considered on time.
* The Board should establish a joint working group to formally document the process through which ICANN responds to GAC advice. The process must require ICANN to provide specific information in a timely manner regarding its position, whether it agrees or disagrees with GAC advice, and for both parties to find mutually acceptable solutions in good faith. The Board and GAC must also establish strategies to ensure that relevant provisions in the Bylaws are met.
* The Board should develop and implement mechanisms to engage the GAC earlier in the policy development process.
* The Board and GAC should work together to create and implement actions to ensure that GAC is well informed regarding ICANN's policy agenda. Both parties should also consider creating/evaluating the role and necessary skills of the ICANN Support Staff to ensure that effective communication is provided.
* The Board is encouraged to increase the level of support and commitment to the GAC process by: encouraging member countries, particularly developing countries, to participate in GAC deliberations; providing multilingual access to ICANN records; and developing a process to identify how and when ICANN deals with senior government officials on public policy issues on a regular or collective basis to complement the GAC process.
At its January 25, 2011 board meeting, the ICANN Board accepted the report and directed ICANN staff to formulate and propose an implementation plan.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-2011-01-25-en#10 Resolution of the Board], January 25, 2011</ref> On June 24, 2011, the board approved all recommendations but one (which required an independent study to assess its feasibility), and announced a plan to maintain regular updates on the implementation of the recommendations.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2011-06-24-en#2 Resolution of the Board], June 24, 2011.</ref>
At its January 25, 2011 board meeting, the ICANN Board accepted the report and directed ICANN staff to formulate and propose an implementation plan.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/minutes-2011-01-25-en#10 Resolution of the Board], January 25, 2011</ref> On June 24, 2011, the board approved all recommendations but one (which required an independent study to assess its feasibility), and announced a plan to maintain regular updates on the implementation of the recommendations.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2011-06-24-en#2 Resolution of the Board], June 24, 2011.</ref>