Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 46: Line 46:  
Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected as other applicants would have withdrawn already, and the new gTLD would be left without an owner. The former model also lumped all TLDs that an individual applicant had applied for in one package. Criticisms stating that such a model would benefit larger companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.<ref name="domainincite"></ref>  
 
Cramton's original model proposed to run auctions during the first quarter of 2013, before ICANN announced the results of their Initial Evaluation. Such a model would allow losing bidders to receive 70% back from their ICANN application fee, but would pose difficulties if winning applicants later discovered their applications were rejected as other applicants would have withdrawn already, and the new gTLD would be left without an owner. The former model also lumped all TLDs that an individual applicant had applied for in one package. Criticisms stating that such a model would benefit larger companies led to a change, so that auctions will now proceed on a TLD-by-TLD basis, with all auctions being simultaneously resolved at the same time.<ref name="domainincite"></ref>  
   −
IAL is the only group that has resolved gTLD contention sets via private auction. The first Applicant Auction was held in June 2013, and resolved 6 domains, selling for a combined $9.01 million <ref name="Applicant Auction">[[http://www.applicantauction.com/blog/2013/6/6/first-applicant-auction-a-success-6-domains-valued-at-over-9-million]</ref>. The second auction will be held on August 13th <ref name="Applicant Auction blog">[[http://www.applicantauction.com/blog/2013/6/19/first-applicant-auction-settled-next-auction-august-13th Next Applicant Auction August 13th]</ref>.
+
IAL is the only group that has resolved gTLD contention sets via private auction. The first Applicant Auction was held in June 2013, and to date, Innovative Auctions has resolved contention for 14 TLDs, with a total sales price of $18.66 million <ref name="Applicant Auction">[[http://www.applicantauction.com/blog/]]</ref>. The next (third) auction will be held on September 23.
   −
[[Innovative Auctions]]' model is preferred by many applicants, including the largest [[TLD]] applicant, [[Donuts]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10828-heres-how-donuts-wants-to-resolve-its-158-new-gtld-contention-fights Here's How Donuts Wants To Resolve its 158 Contention Fights, DomainIncite.com]Published 23 Oct 2012, Retrieved 8 Jan 2013</ref> [[Raymond King]], applicant for 10 TLDs with [[Top Level Design]] expressed his favor for Private Auctions in general, and Innovative Auctions specifically, in an [http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130102_private_vs_icann_auction_of_last_resort/ opinion piece on CircleID].
+
[[Innovative Auctions]]' model is preferred by many applicants, including the largest [[TLD]] applicant, [[Donuts]].<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10828-heres-how-donuts-wants-to-resolve-its-158-new-gtld-contention-fights Here's How Donuts Wants To Resolve its 158 Contention Fights, DomainIncite.com]Published 23 Oct 2012, Retrieved 8 Jan 2013</ref> [[Raymond King]], applicant for 10 TLDs with [[Top Level Design]] expressed his favor for Private Auctions in general, and Innovative Auctions specifically, in an [http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130102_private_vs_icann_auction_of_last_resort/ opinion piece on CircleID]. The Applicant Auction was featured in a recent article in The New Yorker <ref name="New Yorker magazine">[[http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/08/web-domains-great-internet-land-grab.html]]</ref>.
    
===Right of the Dot===
 
===Right of the Dot===
31

edits

Navigation menu