Bureaucrats, staff, Administrators
3,007
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 110:
Line 110: − +
→SSAD
===SSAD===
===SSAD===
On 17 May 2018, the [[ICANN Board]] approved the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data to allow [[CPH|contracted parties]] to [[Contractual Compliance|comply with ICANN contractual]] requirements while also complying with the [[GDPR|European Union's General Data Protection Regulation]], triggering a GNSO Council initiation of a PDP on 19 July 2018. Phase 1 was to confirm the Temporary Specification by 25 May 2019. Phase 2 was chartered to discuss a standardized access model to nonpublic registration data, aka '''SSAD'''.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/initial-report-of-the-expedited-policy-development-process-epdp-on-the-temporary-specification-for-gtld-registration-data-team--phase-2a-03-06-2021 Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2A, ICANN Public Comment]</ref>
On 17 May 2018, the [[ICANN Board]] approved the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data to allow [[CPH|contracted parties]] to [[Contractual Compliance|comply with ICANN contractual]] requirements while also complying with the [[GDPR|European Union's General Data Protection Regulation]], triggering a GNSO Council initiation of a PDP on 19 July 2018. Phase 1 was to confirm the Temporary Specification by 25 May 2019. Phase 2 was chartered to discuss a standardized access model to nonpublic registration data, aka '''[[SSAD]]'''.<ref>[https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/initial-report-of-the-expedited-policy-development-process-epdp-on-the-temporary-specification-for-gtld-registration-data-team--phase-2a-03-06-2021 Initial Report of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data Team – PHASE 2A, ICANN Public Comment]</ref>
* In the public forum, [[Griffin Barnett]] notified the Board that the [[BC]], [[IPC]], the [[NomCom]] appointed representative for the [[NCPH]] did not approve the Phase 2A Final Report at the GNSO Council Vote, because the report does not require differentiation between natural and legal person data processing consistent with the GDPR or publication of a pseudonymized rather than anonymized or web form registrant email (needed to re-enable cross-domain correlation for DNS abuse law enforcement and cybersecurity efforts). [[Mason Cole]] asked why [[PPSAI]] is being held up by the SSAD ODP. [[Becky Burr]] explained that now it's held up due to [[Prioritization Framework|Prioritization]] in that [[EPDP]] Phase 2A needs to go first.
* In the public forum, [[Griffin Barnett]] notified the Board that the [[BC]], [[IPC]], the [[NomCom]] appointed representative for the [[NCPH]] did not approve the Phase 2A Final Report at the GNSO Council Vote, because the report does not require differentiation between natural and legal person data processing consistent with the GDPR or publication of a pseudonymized rather than anonymized or web form registrant email (needed to re-enable cross-domain correlation for DNS abuse law enforcement and cybersecurity efforts). [[Mason Cole]] asked why [[PPSAI]] is being held up by the SSAD ODP. [[Becky Burr]] explained that now it's held up due to [[Prioritization Framework|Prioritization]] in that [[EPDP]] Phase 2A needs to go first.
* [[ALAC]] expressed unhappiness to the [[ICANN Board]] over [[SSAD]] [[ODP]], EPDP phase 2 recommendations, emphasizing SSAD would probably not be worth the cost and would run into trouble with NIS2 when passed.
* [[ALAC]] expressed unhappiness to the [[ICANN Board]] over [[SSAD]] [[ODP]], EPDP phase 2 recommendations, emphasizing SSAD would probably not be worth the cost and would run into trouble with NIS2 when passed.