As with the Article 4-style ICANN Board review, the board determined during the first round of organizational reviews that it would be beneficial if the [[Technical Liaison Group]] engaged in an organizational review process.<ref name="tlgdash">[https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/org/tlg TLG Review Dashboard], last updated August 25, 2011</ref> The [[Technical Liaison Group Review]] was initiated by the board at [[ICANN 37]] in Nairobi in March 2010,<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2010-03-12-en#1.5 Resolution of the Board], March 12, 2010</ref> and continued through 2011.<ref name="tlgdash" /> As with ICANN Board review, the experiment was not repeated. | As with the Article 4-style ICANN Board review, the board determined during the first round of organizational reviews that it would be beneficial if the [[Technical Liaison Group]] engaged in an organizational review process.<ref name="tlgdash">[https://www.icann.org/resources/reviews/org/tlg TLG Review Dashboard], last updated August 25, 2011</ref> The [[Technical Liaison Group Review]] was initiated by the board at [[ICANN 37]] in Nairobi in March 2010,<ref>[https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2010-03-12-en#1.5 Resolution of the Board], March 12, 2010</ref> and continued through 2011.<ref name="tlgdash" /> As with ICANN Board review, the experiment was not repeated. |