Changes

no edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:  
* '''Registrars''' - An intent to use ICANN-accredited registrars when possible.<ref name="iod"></ref>
 
* '''Registrars''' - An intent to use ICANN-accredited registrars when possible.<ref name="iod"></ref>
   −
==Image Online Design & ICANN==
+
==Relationship with ICANN==
 
Image Online Design unsuccessfully applied for the .web gTLD in 2000 and sued ICANN in Fall 2012, citing a breach of contract and trademark infringement. It claimed that ICANN should never have allowed other companies to apply for the gTLD, and is seeking an injunction that prevents ICANN from awarding .web to another bidder and gives Image Online Design profits from the alleged trademark infringement. Its complaint cites an early ICANN meeting where the first proof-of-concept gTLDs were approved by the [[ICANN Board]]; the chair at the time, [[Vint Cerf]], did not approve the .web application filed by [[Afilias]] because of the existence of Image Online Design's .web operations.<ref name="domainincite"></ref>
 
Image Online Design unsuccessfully applied for the .web gTLD in 2000 and sued ICANN in Fall 2012, citing a breach of contract and trademark infringement. It claimed that ICANN should never have allowed other companies to apply for the gTLD, and is seeking an injunction that prevents ICANN from awarding .web to another bidder and gives Image Online Design profits from the alleged trademark infringement. Its complaint cites an early ICANN meeting where the first proof-of-concept gTLDs were approved by the [[ICANN Board]]; the chair at the time, [[Vint Cerf]], did not approve the .web application filed by [[Afilias]] because of the existence of Image Online Design's .web operations.<ref name="domainincite"></ref>
  
staff
8,858

edits