27,652
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + +
→Development
* Should the security of registrant data be increased in order to prevent hacking and spoofing? Should there be a Form of Authorization present to apply a double check?
* Should the security of registrant data be increased in order to prevent hacking and spoofing? Should there be a Form of Authorization present to apply a double check?
* Should there be a provision for handling partial bulk transfers? Partial bulk transfers are those in which a registrar transfers some of its domains and not every domain.
* Should there be a provision for handling partial bulk transfers? Partial bulk transfers are those in which a registrar transfers some of its domains and not every domain.
===2012 Changes===
In January, 2012, ahead of its February [[ICANN 43]] meeting, the organization announced that it was considering changes to its IRTP. The GNSO council approved those changes, which entails defining a universal 5 day maximum allowable lock period for domains that have had changes made to the registrant's name in the [[Whois]] record. Domains with changes made the name of the registrant in the Whois record is locked to prevent transfer, the policy is seen as helping prevent [[Domain Hacking|domain hacking]]. The new rule is seen as largely a response to [[GoDaddy]]'s current 60 day lock policy, which has been a continued target for criticism. GoDaddy, through its representative [[James Bladel]], was involved in creating the proposed changes.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/end-in-sight-for-go-daddys-60-day-transfer-lock/ End in Sight for Go Daddys 60 Day Transfer
==Additional Links==
==Additional Links==