9,082
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: − + + Line 49:
Line 50: − + − +
→Qualifications for Registration
# Registrants must meet certain criteria that is classified by characteristics of the 2nd level domains
# Registrants must meet certain criteria that is classified by characteristics of the 2nd level domains
==KRNIC and ICANN==On November 3, 2000, Chun Eung Hwi, member Name & Number Committee of KRNIC made the following recommendations to ICANN forum regarding new generic top-level domains ([[gTLD]]): <ref>[http://forum.icann.org/tldreport/3A12F5F500000431.html]</ref>
==KRNIC and ICANN==
On November 3, 2000, Chun Eung Hwi, member Name & Number Committee of KRNIC made the following recommendations to [[ICANN]] forum regarding new generic top-level domains ([[gTLD]]): <ref>[http://forum.icann.org/tldreport/3A12F5F500000431.html]</ref>
# Selection of numerous diverse gTLDs as possible to allow the ICANN and the internet community to evaluate possible impacts of the introduction of new gTLDs and ensure the steady and continuous introduction of new gTLDs in the future.
# Selection of numerous diverse gTLDs as possible to allow the ICANN and the internet community to evaluate possible impacts of the introduction of new gTLDs and ensure the steady and continuous introduction of new gTLDs in the future.
# To be able to ease the over-crowding of the .com domain space, several comparable should be selected.
# To be able to ease the over-crowding of the .com domain space, several comparable should be selected.
# ICANN should consider a different approach for new gTLDs representing public interest or non-profit groups, for example ICANN might select new gTLDs and invite for proposals under a special contract & conditions.
# ICANN should consider a different approach for new gTLDs representing public interest or non-profit groups, for example ICANN might select new gTLDs and invite for proposals under a special contract & conditions.
# The total sum of the non-refundable application fee of $50,000 for submission of gTLD should be much more lowered and the institution cited that it is a fundamental barrier in the proposal process. The fee must be determined following the analysis of expenditure details in scrutiny.
# The total sum of the non-refundable application fee of $50,000 for submission of gTLD should be much more lowered and the institution cited that it is a fundamental barrier in the proposal process. The fee must be determined following the analysis of expenditure details in scrutiny.
# To keep the coherent principle in all gTLDs, two existing gTLDs, .gov, and .mil, should be transformed to the 2nd level subdomains of .us domain.
# To keep the coherent principle in all gTLDs, two existing gTLDs, [[.gov]], and [[.mil]], should be transformed to the 2nd level subdomains of .us domain.
==Refrences==
==Refrences==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}