Changes

==Cybersquatting Case==

==Cybersquatting Case==

CPH represented [[Verizon]] in a 33.15 million [[cybesquatting]] case filed against [[OnlineNIC]], a San Francisco-based domain name registration company using at least 663 domain names that were easily confused with the legitimate Verizon domain name in order to take advantage of Verizon customers. The infringing domain name addresses displayed advertisements that generated revenue for OnlineNIC. The Federal Court of Northern California ruled that OnlineNIC tried to take advantage of Verizon and its customers by registering domain names in bad faith, with an objective to attract internet users who want to access the legitimate website of Verizon.<ref>[http://www.cph.com/sub/cph-wins4.jsp? Press Release]</ref>

CPH represented [[Verizon]] in a 33.15 million [[cybersquatting]] case filed against [[OnlineNIC]], a San Francisco-based domain name registration company using at least 663 domain names that were easily confused with the legitimate Verizon domain name in order to take advantage of Verizon customers. The infringing domain name addresses displayed advertisements that generated revenue for OnlineNIC. The Federal Court of Northern California ruled that OnlineNIC tried to take advantage of Verizon and its customers by registering domain names in bad faith, with an objective to attract internet users who want to access the legitimate website of Verizon.<ref>[http://www.cph.com/sub/cph-wins4.jsp? Press Release]</ref>

==References==

==References==