14,932
edits
Changes
no edit summary
<div style="background:#61A376; font-family:sans-serif;font-weight:bold;text-align:left;color:#F2EFEA;height: 1.5em;margin:.2em 0em .1em 0em; padding:.5em .25em .5em .75em;border-radius:5px;">In the News</div>
<div style="background:#61A376; font-family:sans-serif;font-weight:bold;text-align:left;color:#F2EFEA;height: 1.5em;margin:.2em 0em .1em 0em; padding:.5em .25em .5em .75em;border-radius:5px;">In the News</div>
<div style="width:97%;padding:.5em .5em .5em .5em;">
<div style="width:97%;padding:.5em .5em .5em .5em;">
* [https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/01/dsa-eu-parliaments-position-ensures-free-internet-human-rights-safeguards-need-be On January 20], the European Parliament agreed on a draft set of amendments to the proposed [[DSA]] concerning measures to tackle illegal content, hold platforms accountable for their algorithms, and improve content moderation. The [https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0014_EN.html text] was approved with 530 votes to 78, with 80 abstentions, presenting a unified position ahead of final negotiations with the European Council.
* [https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/01/dsa-eu-parliaments-position-ensures-free-internet-human-rights-safeguards-need-be On January 20], the European Parliament agreed on a draft set of amendments to the proposed [https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act-package DSA] concerning measures to tackle illegal content, hold platforms accountable for their algorithms, and improve content moderation. The [https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0014_EN.html text] was approved with 530 votes to 78, with 80 abstentions, presenting a unified position ahead of final negotiations with the European Council.
* On January 25, [[Google]] Domains launched early access registrations for [[.day]].
* On January 25, [[Google]] Domains launched early access registrations for [[.day]].
* On January 27, the [[GNSO Council]] and [[ICANN Board]] discussed the [[ODA]] for the [[SSAD]]. In particular, the discussants raised topics such as the merits and costs of accreditation, the legal risks involved in SSAD, the development of a requestor code of conduct, the need for a pilot version, shortening the timeline, and improving the estimate of potential users.
* On January 27, the [[GNSO Council]] and [[ICANN Board]] discussed the [[ODA]] for the [[SSAD]]. In particular, the discussants raised topics such as the merits and costs of accreditation, the legal risks involved in SSAD, the development of a requestor code of conduct, the need for a pilot version, shortening the timeline, and improving the estimate of potential users.