Changes

no edit summary
Line 62: Line 62:  
* The 25 strings not eligible for the alternative path were: [[.blog]], [[.box]], [[.business]], [[.casa]], [[.cisco]], [[.comcast]], [[.dev]], [[.family]], [[.free]], [[.google]], [[.iinet]], [[.mail]], [[.network]], [[.office]], [[.orange]], [[.philips]], [[.prod]], [[.sfr]], [[.site]], [[.taobao]], [[.taxi]], [[.web]], [[.work]], [[.world]], and [[.zip]].
 
* The 25 strings not eligible for the alternative path were: [[.blog]], [[.box]], [[.business]], [[.casa]], [[.cisco]], [[.comcast]], [[.dev]], [[.family]], [[.free]], [[.google]], [[.iinet]], [[.mail]], [[.network]], [[.office]], [[.orange]], [[.philips]], [[.prod]], [[.sfr]], [[.site]], [[.taobao]], [[.taxi]], [[.web]], [[.work]], [[.world]], and [[.zip]].
   −
===Risk Mitigation Report===
+
===Risk Mitigation Report by JAS Advisors===
On 26 February 2014, ICANN posted the followup report it commissioned [[JAS Advisors]] to prepare in order to suggest a plan for risk mitigation of the name collision issue. The report, titled "Mitigating The Risk of DNS Namespace Collisions"
+
On 26 February 2014, ICANN posted the followup report it commissioned [[JAS Advisors]] to prepare in order to suggest a plan for risk mitigation of the name collision issue. It was posted for public comment for about a month and then will be decided on by the ICANN Board. The report, titled "Mitigating The Risk of DNS Namespace Collisions," makes a number of key recommendations for resolving the name collision issue for most applicants:<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/name-collision-26feb14-en.htm Name Collision, 26 Feb 2014, ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Feb 2014</ref>
 +
 
 +
* Registries would be able to implement a controlled interruption zone, in which would involve "wildcarding" all SLDs (or all SLDs in the block list) to specific IP that would then alert internal networks if there were any name collisions.
 +
* ICANN would implement an emergency plan and strategy in case name collisions had a "clear danger to human life".
 +
* ICANN and community should continue to study and analyze data from this issue.
 +
* Apart from the .corp and .home names that were previously deemed too dangerous to ever delegate, the study recommended that [[.mail]] also be reserved permanently.<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-26feb14-en.htm Announcement 26 Feb 2014, ICANN.org] Retrieved 27 Feb 2014</ref>
 +
 
 +
The report brought a possible new way forward for many New gTLD applicants.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/15925-new-gtld-registries-given-way-to-free-up-millions-of-blocked-names New gTLD Registries Given Way to Free up Millions of Blocked Names, DomainIncite] Retrieved 27 Feb 2014</ref>
 
==References==
 
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
 
{{reflist}}
    
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__