Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
{{RightTOC}}
 
The '''New gTLD Program''' is a current program to add an unlimited number of new [[gTLD]]s to the [[Root Zone|root zone]]. The program's goal is to enhance competition, innovation, and consumer choice.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/program About the New gTLD Program icann.org]</ref> The first application round started on January 12th, 2012, and ended on April 20th, 2012, during which time [[New gTLD Applicants|applicants]] applied via the [[TAS|TLD Application System]] (TAS) to run the registry for the TLD that they choose. The application window was supposed to close on April 12th, but due to a glitch in the TAS system the system was shut down for a period of time before it reopened for a one week window to allow applicants to finish using the system.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/8511-tas-glitch-not-an-attack-says-icann TAS glitch “not an attack” says ICANN], DomainIncite.com. Published 12 April 2012. Retrieved 19 December 2012.</ref>
 
The '''New gTLD Program''' is a current program to add an unlimited number of new [[gTLD]]s to the [[Root Zone|root zone]]. The program's goal is to enhance competition, innovation, and consumer choice.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/program About the New gTLD Program icann.org]</ref> The first application round started on January 12th, 2012, and ended on April 20th, 2012, during which time [[New gTLD Applicants|applicants]] applied via the [[TAS|TLD Application System]] (TAS) to run the registry for the TLD that they choose. The application window was supposed to close on April 12th, but due to a glitch in the TAS system the system was shut down for a period of time before it reopened for a one week window to allow applicants to finish using the system.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/8511-tas-glitch-not-an-attack-says-icann TAS glitch “not an attack” says ICANN], DomainIncite.com. Published 12 April 2012. Retrieved 19 December 2012.</ref>
    
In April 2012, after closure of registration for the ICANN New gTLD Program, it was revealed that there were 1,268 applicants in the program.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-expects-at-least-1268-new-gtld-applications/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DomainIncite+%28DomainIncite.com%29 ICANN Expects At Least 1268 New gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref> On June, 13th ("Reveal Day"), it was announced that there were 1,930 applications: 84 of these were [[Community gTLD|community applications]], 116 are for [[IDN]]s, and 230 of the applications have one or more applicant and will thus go through [[String Contention|string contention]] processes. This means the first round of the new gTLD program could create a maximum of 1,409 new TLDs.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/nnew-gtlds-by-the-numbers-1930-apps-751-apps-in-conflict-max-number-of-new-gtlds-1409/ New gTLDs by the Numbers, TheDomains.com]</ref>
 
In April 2012, after closure of registration for the ICANN New gTLD Program, it was revealed that there were 1,268 applicants in the program.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-expects-at-least-1268-new-gtld-applications/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DomainIncite+%28DomainIncite.com%29 ICANN Expects At Least 1268 New gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref> On June, 13th ("Reveal Day"), it was announced that there were 1,930 applications: 84 of these were [[Community gTLD|community applications]], 116 are for [[IDN]]s, and 230 of the applications have one or more applicant and will thus go through [[String Contention|string contention]] processes. This means the first round of the new gTLD program could create a maximum of 1,409 new TLDs.<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/nnew-gtlds-by-the-numbers-1930-apps-751-apps-in-conflict-max-number-of-new-gtlds-1409/ New gTLDs by the Numbers, TheDomains.com]</ref>
   −
<center>See complete lists of:<br><big>[[All New gTLD Applications]] &#151;[[New gTLD Generic Applications|Generic Applications]] &#151; [[New gTLD Geographic Applications|Geographic Applications]] &#151; [[New gTLD Brand Applications|Brand Applications]] &#151; [[New gTLD IDN Applications|IDN Applications]]</big></center><br/>
+
<center>See complete lists of:<br><big>[[All New gTLD Applications]] - [[New gTLD Generic Applications|Generic Applications]] - [[New gTLD Geographic Applications|Geographic Applications]] - [[New gTLD Brand Applications|Brand Applications]] [[New gTLD IDN Applications|IDN Applications]]</big></center><br/>
    
==Overview==
 
==Overview==
Line 13: Line 14:     
===Historical Background===
 
===Historical Background===
ICANN has been working on adding new extensions for years, and the current "new" gTLD program is actually the 4th round of gTLD expansion. The prior rounds were limited and specific: in 2000 there was a "proof of concept round", a round of [[sTLD]]s in 2003, and an ongoing process to introduce [[IDN ccTLD]]s.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/watch-icann-approve-some-new-gtlds/ Watch ICANN Approve Some New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref> After the results of the 2000 and 2003 expansions of new gTLDs, a [[PDP|Policy Development Process]] in connection with the introduction of new gTLDs was developed by the [[Generic Names Supporting Organization]] (GNSO), which lasted from 2005 until 2007. During this Policy Development Process, the GNSO conducted extensive and detailed consultations with all constituencies within the ICANN global internet community. In 2008, 19 Specific Policy Recommendations were adopted by the ICANN Board for the implementation of new gTLDs, which describe the specifics of allocation and the contractual conditions. ICANN involved the global internet community in an open, inclusive and transparent implementation process to comment, review and provide their input toward creating the Applicant Guidebook for New gTLDs. The protection of intellectual property, community interests, consumer protection, and DNS stability were addressed during the process. Different versions and multiple drafts of the Applicant Guidebook were released in 2008. By June 2011, the ICANN Board launched the New gTLD Program, at the same time approving the [[New gTLD Applicant Guidebook]].<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/about/program About the New gTLD Program]</ref> The Board announced the possibility of a 9th version of the Guidebook in January 2012, but the industry speculated that there was little chance that the changes would be more than clarification, as opposed to new rules and policies.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-confirms-possible-new-applicant-guidebook/ ICANN Confirms Possible New Applicant Guidebook, DomainIncite.com]</ref> The 9th version was released at the same time the application window opened, and as expected most of the changes were minor. One major change in the 9th version was greater power given to the [[Governmental Advisory Committee]] in forcing the [[ICANN Board]] to manually review any application that the GAC finds problematic. Exactly how many oppositions within the GAC would be necessary to cause Board consultation is vague, but it could be as few as one nation's objection. This change was made following a letter from U.S. Government Secretary [[Larry Strickling]], which noted that the GAC would have the power to create new procedure after reviewing the entire pool of applications; that letter is further detailed below.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/gac-gets-more-power-to-block-controversial-gtlds/ GAC Gets more Power to Block Controversial gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
+
ICANN has been working on adding new extensions for years, and the current "new" gTLD program is actually the 4th round of gTLD expansion. The prior rounds were limited and specific: in 2000 there was a "proof of concept round", a round of [[sTLD]]s in 2003, and an ongoing process to introduce [[IDN]] [[ccTLD]]s.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/watch-icann-approve-some-new-gtlds/ Watch ICANN Approve Some New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref> After the results of the 2000 and 2003 expansions of new gTLDs, a [[PDP|Policy Development Process]] in connection with the introduction of new gTLDs was developed by the [[Generic Names Supporting Organization]] (GNSO), which lasted from 2005 until 2007. During this Policy Development Process, the GNSO conducted extensive and detailed consultations with all constituencies within the ICANN global internet community. In 2008, 19 Specific Policy Recommendations were adopted by the ICANN Board for the implementation of new gTLDs, which describe the specifics of allocation and the contractual conditions. ICANN involved the global internet community in an open, inclusive and transparent implementation process to comment, review and provide their input toward creating the Applicant Guidebook for New gTLDs. The protection of intellectual property, community interests, consumer protection, and DNS stability were addressed during the process. Different versions and multiple drafts of the Applicant Guidebook were released in 2008. By June 2011, the ICANN Board launched the New gTLD Program, at the same time approving the [[New gTLD Applicant Guidebook]].<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/about/program About the New gTLD Program]</ref> The Board announced the possibility of a 9th version of the Guidebook in January 2012, but the industry speculated that there was little chance that the changes would be more than clarification, as opposed to new rules and policies.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-confirms-possible-new-applicant-guidebook/ ICANN Confirms Possible New Applicant Guidebook, DomainIncite.com]</ref> The 9th version was released at the same time the application window opened, and as expected most of the changes were minor. One major change in the 9th version was greater power given to the [[Governmental Advisory Committee]] in forcing the [[ICANN Board]] to manually review any application that the GAC finds problematic. Exactly how many oppositions within the GAC would be necessary to cause Board consultation is vague, but it could be as few as one nation's objection. This change was made following a letter from U.S. Government Secretary [[Larry Strickling]], which noted that the GAC would have the power to create new procedure after reviewing the entire pool of applications; that letter is further detailed below.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/gac-gets-more-power-to-block-controversial-gtlds/ GAC Gets more Power to Block Controversial gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
    
===New gTLD Program Committee===
 
===New gTLD Program Committee===
Line 22: Line 23:  
* [[Chris Disspain]] (Member)
 
* [[Chris Disspain]] (Member)
 
* [[Bill Graham]] (Member)
 
* [[Bill Graham]] (Member)
* [[Olga Madruga-Forti]] (Member)
+
* [[Alexander_Svensson]] (Member)
* [[Erika Mann]] (Member)
   
* [[Gonzalo Navarro]] (Member)
 
* [[Gonzalo Navarro]] (Member)
 
* [[Ray Plzak]] (Member)
 
* [[Ray Plzak]] (Member)
Line 179: Line 179:  
[[Name.Space]], which has been operating an alternative root since 1996, sued ICANN in October, 2012, for trademark infringement and anti-competitive behavior. The company is seeking an injunction against the implementation of any of the 189 [[TLD]]s applied for in the 2011 round that overlap with its alternative [[Root Zone|root zone]]. The suit alleges that the company is being victimized by "ICANN insiders". In the 2000 TLD expansion round, Name.Space applied to have 118 of its 482 alternative [[TLD]]s added into ICANN's root zone. The plaintiff is asking for damages and and the injunction to prevent ICANN's approval and root implementation of the 189 overlapping TLDs.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10754-company-files-for-injunction-against-189-new-gtlds Company Files for Injunction Against 189 New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
 
[[Name.Space]], which has been operating an alternative root since 1996, sued ICANN in October, 2012, for trademark infringement and anti-competitive behavior. The company is seeking an injunction against the implementation of any of the 189 [[TLD]]s applied for in the 2011 round that overlap with its alternative [[Root Zone|root zone]]. The suit alleges that the company is being victimized by "ICANN insiders". In the 2000 TLD expansion round, Name.Space applied to have 118 of its 482 alternative [[TLD]]s added into ICANN's root zone. The plaintiff is asking for damages and and the injunction to prevent ICANN's approval and root implementation of the 189 overlapping TLDs.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/10754-company-files-for-injunction-against-189-new-gtlds Company Files for Injunction Against 189 New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
   −
==Chinese version of this page==
+
==Search performance==
===新通用顶级域项目 ===
+
The performance of new gTLDs in search is a question of great interest to current and potential future gTLD applicants, and will have a huge impact on uptake of new gTLDs in the future.  
新通用顶级域项目是一项当前正在开展的项目,可以向 [[Root Zone|根区域]]添加无限数量的新 [[gTLD|通用顶级域]]。该项目的目标是增加竞争、创新和消费者选择。.<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/program About the New gTLD Program icann.org]</ref> 第一轮申请于2012年1月12日开始,于2012年4月20日结束,在此期间,[[New gTLD Applicants|申请人]]通过[[TAS|顶级域申请系统]](TAS)为他们选择的顶级域申请运营注册局。该申请窗口本应于4月12日关闭,但是由于TAS系统出现了一个小故障,导致系统关闭了一段时间,之后又重新开启一周,允许申请人完成对系统的使用。<ref>[http://domainincite.com/8511-tas-glitch-not-an-attack-says-icann TAS glitch “not an attack” says ICANN], DomainIncite.com. Published 12 April 2012. Retrieved 19 December 2012.</ref>
+
As of December 2014, no clear consensus has emerged. Some have found that new gTLDs perform as well as or better than original TLDs, <ref>[http://www.circleid.com/posts/20141210_early_data_suggests_new_gtlds_perform_well_in_search_environment/ Early data suggests new gTLDs perform well in search environment] Circleid, retrieved 17th December 2014.</ref> while others maintain that new gTLDs have no advantage in search.<ref>[http://domainnamewire.com/2014/12/15/new-tlds-search-results/ New TLDs search results] Domain Name Wire 15th December 2014, retrieved 17th December 2014.</ref>
 
  −
在2012年4月,结束对互联网名称与数字地址分配机构(ICANN)的“新通用顶级域项目”的注册以后,结果显示共有1,268名申请人参与该项目。<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-expects-at-least-1268-new-gtld-applications/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+DomainIncite+%28DomainIncite.com%29 ICANN Expects At Least 1268 New gTLD Applications, DomainIncite.com]</ref>据6月13日(“揭晓日”)的结果显示,共有1,930份申请:其中有84份为[[Community gTLD|社区申请]],116份为针对[[IDN|]国际化域名(IDN)]的申请,还有230份申请中包含一名或多名申请人,因此需要通过[[String Contention|字符串争用机制]] 来解决。这意味着“新通用顶级域项目”的首轮将最多产生1,409个新通用顶级域。<ref>[http://www.thedomains.com/2012/06/13/nnew-gtlds-by-the-numbers-1930-apps-751-apps-in-conflict-max-number-of-new-gtlds-1409/ New gTLDs by the Numbers, TheDomains.com]</ref>
  −
 
  −
<center>查看以下类别申请的完整清单:<br><big>[[All New gTLD Applications|新通用顶级域的所有申请]] &#151;[[New gTLD Generic Applications|通用类申请]] &#151; [[New gTLD Geographic Applications|通用类申请]] &#151; [[New gTLD Brand Applications|品牌类申请]] &#151; [[New gTLD IDN Applications|国际化域名类(IDN)申请]]</big></center><br/>
  −
 
  −
==概述==
  −
不同类型的新通用顶级域申请:<ref>[http://urbanbrain.jp/en/new-gtld/application-types/ New gTLD Application Types]</ref>
  −
* [[New gTLD Generic Applications|标准或通用类顶级域]] -在此类申请下,被提议的新通用顶级域面向公众开放注册。字符串没有任何限制。此类申请大部分都是通用类名称,但是部分通用类名称的申请,特别是[[Amazon|亚马逊]] 和 [[Google|谷歌]] 对通用类名称的申请,建议仅限以公司目的来使用这些顶级域。
  −
* [[Community gTLD|社区类顶级域]] -此类申请下被提议的新通用顶级域仅限于具有高度社会认知度的特定社区使用。申请应受到社区的强烈支持。社区顶级域的例子包括: [[.catholic]], [[.thai]], [[.aarp]]等。
  −
* [[New gTLD Geographic Applications|地理类顶级域]] -此类申请代表一个特定的城市或地区;此类顶级域需要当地政府的支持,例如: [[.nyc]], [[.berlin]], [[.tokyo]]等。
  −
* [[New gTLD Brand Applications|品牌类顶级域]] -公司和机构可以使用其品牌名称和商标申请属于他们自己的顶级域。比如: [[.unicef]], [[.motorola]], [[.hitachi]], [[.deloitte]]等。
  −
 
  −
===历史背景===
  −
数年来,互联网名称与数字地址分配机构(ICANN)一直致力于添加新的扩展名,而目前的“新”通用顶级域项目实际上是通用顶级域的第四轮扩展。前几轮都具有局限性和针对性:在2000年,进行了一轮“概念验证”类扩展,在2003年进行了一轮赞助类[[sTLD顶级域(sTLD)|sTLD顶级域]]扩展,以及正在持续进行的引入[[IDN ccTLD|国际化的国家代码顶级域(IDN ccTLDs)]] 的过程。<ref>[http://domainincite.com/watch-icann-approve-some-new-gtlds/ Watch ICANN Approve Some New gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>根据2000年和2003年的新通用顶级域的扩展结果,一项由[[Generic Names Supporting Organization|通用名称支持组织(GNSO)]]开发的与新通用顶级域的引入相关的[[PDP|政策制定流程(PDP)]]从2005年一直进行到2007年。在开发这个政策制定流程期间,GNSO与ICANN全球互联网社区内的所有成员进行了广泛而细致的磋商。在2008年,19个特定政策建议被ICANN董事会采纳用以实施新通用顶级域,其中对分配和合同条款进行了详细描述。ICANN让全球互联网社区参与了一次开放的、包容的和透明的实施过程,让他们对创建新通用顶级域的“申请人指南”进行评价、审查并提供建议。该过程期间涉及了知识产权保护、社区利益、消费者保护和DNS稳定性的问题。在2008年,申请人指南的不同版本和多次草稿得以发布。到2011年6月,ICANN董事会启动了新通用顶级域项目,同时批准了[[New gTLD Applicant Guidebook|新通用顶级域申请人指南]]。<ref>[http://newgtlds.icann.org/about/program About the New gTLD Program]</ref>董事会宣布,在2012年1月有可能推出该指南的第9版,但是业内推测,更多的将是阐释而不是新规则和新政策,更改多于阐释的可能性很小。<ref>[http://domainincite.com/icann-confirms-possible-new-applicant-guidebook/ ICANN Confirms Possible New Applicant Guidebook, DomainIncite.com]</ref>最终,第9版的推出与开放申请窗口在同一时间进行,并且不出所料,大部分的更改都是轻微的。第9版中的一个主要变动是授予[[Governmental Advisory Committee|政府咨询委员会(GAC)]] 更大的权力,从而强制[[ICANN Board|ICANN董事会]]GAC发现的任何有问题的申请进行人工审核。具体GAC内部要有多少异议才会导致董事会进行磋商并不确定,但是可以少至一个国家的反对。这一变更是在美国政府秘书[[Larry Strickling|拉里•斯特里克林(Larry Strickling)]]发出的一封信后做出的,信中提到GAC在审核全部申请后将拥有创建新程序的权力;信件详细内容见下文。<ref>[http://domainincite.com/gac-gets-more-power-to-block-controversial-gtlds/ GAC Gets more Power to Block Controversial gTLDs, DomainIncite.com]</ref>
  −
 
  −
===新通用顶级域项目委员会===
  −
在2012年4月10日,[[ICANN Board|ICANN董事会]]创建了'''[[New gTLD Program Committee|新通用顶级域项目委员会]],''',主要负责其章程中“董事会拥有的与新通用顶级域项目相关的所有法定权力和决策权”。然而,ICANN章程中第2章条款XII下其他与项目有关的禁止被授权的职责除外。<ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-10apr12-en.htm Establishment of New gTLD Program Committee]</ref>当前的成员包括:
  −
* [[Cherine Chalaby]] (主席)
  −
* [[Fadi Chehade]] (成员)
  −
* [[Chris Disspain]] (成员)
  −
* [[Bill Graham]] (成员)
  −
* [[Olga Madruga-Forti]] (成员)
  −
* [[Erika Mann]] (成员)
  −
* [[Gonzalo Navarro]] (成员)
  −
* [[Ray Plzak]] (成员)
  −
* [[George Sadowsky]] (成员)
  −
* [[Michael Silber]] (成员)
  −
* [[Kuo-Wei Wu]] (成员)
  −
* [[Heather Dryden]] (无表决权联络人)
  −
* [[Jonne Soininen]] (无表决权联络人)
  −
 
      
==References==
 
==References==
Line 218: Line 187:  
{{reflist}}</div>
 
{{reflist}}</div>
   −
[[Category: Glossary]]
+
[[Category:Glossary]]
 +
[[Category:Articles with Chinese]]
 +
[[Category:New gTLD Program]]
Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, lookupuser, staff, Administrators, translator
11,770

edits

Navigation menu