14,932
edits
Changes
-Category:Past Supporters; +Category:Past Sponsors using HotCat
==Digital Archery Engine==
==Digital Archery Engine==
In April 2012, the company announced its [[Digital Archery|digital archery]] service offering to new gTLD applicants through its '''Digital Archery Engine.''' The company will charge $25,000 if the company will be able to acquire acquire a guaranteed time stamp that will put an applicant to the first batch that will be initially evaluated by ICANN. If an applicant is included in the first 50% of batches, the service fee will be $10,000 while applicants who will get lower batches than first 50% will be free. <ref>[http://domainincite.com/8501-pool-com-offers-25k-gtld-digital-archery-service Pool.com offers $25k gTLD digital archery service]</ref> <ref>[http://www.pool.com/gtld/digitalarchery.aspx Digital Archery Engine]</ref>
In April 2012, the company announced its [[Digital Archery|digital archery]] service offering to new gTLD applicants through its '''Digital Archery Engine.''' It was a pro-rated service, starting at a $25,000 cost for a first [[Batching|batch]] placement, and no fee would be assessed for a low batch placement.<ref>[http://domainincite.com/8501-pool-com-offers-25k-gtld-digital-archery-service Pool.com offers $25k gTLD digital archery service]</ref> <ref>[http://www.pool.com/gtld/digitalarchery.aspx Digital Archery Engine]</ref>
In a letter to ICANN, the [[IPC|Intellectual Property Constituency]] (IPC) criticized Pool.com and described it as an "insider exploiting the digital archery system as a “revenue extraction opportunity." In his response, Rob Hall was thankful to the IPC for the free advertisement and argued that the company is not manipulating anything or offering its service to insiders but that they are offered to everyone. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/metalitz-to-icann-board-09may12- IPC Letter to ICANN On Digital Archery Batching Method]</ref><ref>[http://domainincite.com/8968-brands-are-pool-coms-surprise-digital-archery-clients Brands are Pool.com’s surprise digital archery clients]</ref>
In a letter to ICANN, the Intellectual Property Constituency ([[IPC]]) criticized Pool.com and described it as an "insider exploiting the digital archery system as a “revenue extraction opportunity." In response, Hall is thankful to the IPC for the free advertisement and argued that the company is not manipulating anything or offering its service to insiders rather it is offered to everyone. <ref>[http://www.icann.org/en/news/correspondence/metalitz-to-icann-board-09may12- IPC Letter to ICANN On Digital Archery Batching Method]</ref> <ref>
[http://domainincite.com/8968-brands-are-pool-coms-surprise-digital-archery-clients Brands are Pool.com’s surprise digital archery clients]</ref>
== References ==
== References ==
* [http://www.pool.com/ Pool.com]
* [http://www.pool.com/ Pool.com]
[[Category: Registrars]]
[[Category: Registrars]]
[[Category: Past Sponsor]]
[[Category:Marketplaces]]
[[Category:Past Sponsors]]
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__