Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reconsideration (view source)

Revision as of 22:50, 10 January 2022

5,959 bytes added ,  2 years ago
→‎Summary Table of Requests
Line 583: Line 583:  
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2014-09-08-en#1.c Denied]
 
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-new-gtld-2014-09-08-en#1.c Denied]
 
| [https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-advice/durban47 GAC Advice from ICANN 47]
 
| [https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/gac-advice/durban47 GAC Advice from ICANN 47]
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-28-2014-06-11-en 14-28:] [[DotMusic]]
 +
| Requesting reconsideration of ICANN's acceptance of change requests from Amazon for its [[.music]], [[.song]], and [[.tunes]] applications after receipt of GAC advice regarding generic terms
 +
| No
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-29-2014-06-16-en 14-29:] DotKids Foundation
 +
| ICANN deferred DotKids' application change request until the completion of the CPE process for [[.kids]]
 +
| No
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-30-2014-06-25-en 14-30], [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-32-2014-06-26-en 14-32], and [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-33-2014-06-26-en 14-33]: Dot Registry, LLC
 +
| Dot Registry requested reconsideration of its failed CPE processes for [[.llc]], [[.inc]], and [[.llp]]
 +
| No
 +
| Deny
 +
| Board separately initiated an assessment of its relationship with its CPE panel provider]
 +
| Dot Registry ultimately withdrew all three RRs
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-31-2014-06-25-en 14-31:] TLDDOT GmbH
 +
| TLDDOT did not prevail in a CPE for [[.gmbh]]
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| Requester's areguments for reconsideration were almost entirely substantive, and therefore failed to establish a claim for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-34-2014-07-01-en 14-34:] Despegar Online SRL, DotHotel, Inc., dot Hotel Limited, Fegistry, LLC, Spring McCook, LLC, and Top Level Domain Holdings Limited
 +
| The six requesters were appealing Hotel Top-Level-Domain S.a.r.l.'s successful CPE for [[.hotel]]
 +
| No
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-35-2014-07-08-en 14-35:] Amazon EU S.a.r.l.
 +
| Reconsideration of the staff response to Amazon's [[Document Information Disclosure Policy|DIDP]] request regarding RR 14-27
 +
| No
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| "As there is no indication that ICANN violated any policy or procedure with respect to its response to the Requester’s DIDP Request, and given that portions of Request 14-35 are simply premature as ICANN has stated that it is still reviewing documents, the instant Request 14-35 should not proceed."
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-36-2014-07-25-en 14-36:] Asia Spa and Wellness Promotion Council (ASWPC)
 +
| ICANN denied ASWPC's request to modify its application for [[.spa]]
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-37-2014-08-20-en 14-37:] iRegistry Ltd.
 +
| NGPC's adoption of the [[Name Collision Occurrence Management Framework]]
 +
| No
 +
| Deny
 +
| Deny
 +
| iRegistry did not prove that it was actually adversely affected by the adoption of the policy
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-38-2014-08-29-en 14-38:] The [[Business Constituency]], the [[Registries Stakeholder Group]], and the [[Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group]]
 +
| Protesting the staff "imposition" of an Accountability Plan as posted, without public comment or bottom-up process
 +
| Withdrawn
 +
| No recommendation
 +
| No action taken
 +
| It  appears that either this request inspired a change in process, or was overtaken by events - an additional public comment period was announced shortly after the request was filed.
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-39-2014-09-23-en 14-39:] Despegar Online SRL, Radix FZC, Famous Four Media Limited, Fegistry, LLC, Donuts, Inc., Minds + Machines
 +
| Reconsideration of the staff response to a [[Document Information Disclosure Policy|DIDP]] request regarding the [[.hotel]] CPE
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-40-2014-09-26-en 14-40:] Dadotart, Inc.
 +
| Dadotart did not prevail in a [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.art]]
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-41-2014-09-29-en 14-41:] Afilias Limited, BRS Media Inc., and Tin Dale, LLC
 +
| Reconsideration of the European Broadcasting Union's succesful [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.radio]]; and ICANN staff's response to a [[Document Information Disclosure Policy|DIDP]] request concerning the same CPE
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-42-2014-09-30-en 14-42:] Ministry of Industry, Trade, Investment and Digital Economy of the Kingdom of Morocco
 +
| Handling of Morocco's objection to the [[.tata]] domain application
 +
| No
 +
| No recommendation
 +
| No action taken
 +
| The reconsideration request was deemed moot  - Morocco's other efforts for relief succeeded before the RR was considered by the BGC
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-43-2014-10-21-en 14-43:] City of Spa
 +
| ICANN decision to process applications for [[.spa]] as non-geographic name applications
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-44-2014-10-22-en 14-44:] dotgay LLC
 +
| dotgay did not prevail in a [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.gay]]
 +
| No
 +
| Approve reconsideration
 +
| No action taken
 +
| "Accepting the Request merely allows the appointment of new CPE evaluators (and potentially new core team members) to conduct a new evaluation and issue a new report that will supersede the existing CPE Panel’s Report." (see RR 15-21)
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-45-2014-10-22-en 14-45:] .music LLC
 +
| .music LLC did not prevail in a [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.music]]
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 +
|-
 +
| [https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/14-46-2014-10-22-en 14-46:] Little Birch, LLC and Minds + Machines Group Limited
 +
| Reconsideration of Big Room, LLC's successful [[Community Priority Evaluation]] for [[.eco]]
 +
| No*
 +
| Deny
 +
| No action taken
 +
| No proper grounds for reconsideration
 
|}
 
|}
  
JP
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits

Retrieved from "https://icannwiki.org/Special:MobileDiff/1341947"

Navigation menu