Changes

Line 288: Line 288:     
In both cases, the conversation tended toward an autopsy of the review team's process and rationales.<ref name="septcaucus" />
 
In both cases, the conversation tended toward an autopsy of the review team's process and rationales.<ref name="septcaucus" />
 +
 +
In December 2021, ICANN org submitted its first series of clarifying questions to the implementation shepherds listserv.<ref name="decemail">[https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-implementation-shepherds/2021-December/000017.html Email to SSR2 Implementation Shepherds: 'Pending/Likely to Be Approved' Recommendations - Clarifying Questions], December 7, 2021</ref> The questions dealt with the recommendations in the "Pending - Likely to be Approved" category, and sought clarification based on the scorecard assessments and board rationales for those recommendations.<ref>[https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-implementation-shepherds/attachments/20211207/489d314e/SSR2ISESQuestions-Group1-Likelytobeapproved-Final-0001.pdf SSR2 Questions - Group 1: Pending/Likely to be Approved], December 7, 2021 (PDF)</ref> ICANN org hoped to receive answers to these questions by January 14, 2022<ref name="decemail" />
    
==References==
 
==References==
Bureaucrats, Check users, lookupuser, Administrators, translator
3,197

edits