3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 63:
Line 63: − + Line 155:
Line 155: + + + + +
no edit summary
===Final Report===
===Final Report===
Meridian's final report was published in August 2019<ref name="finalrep">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-assessment-recs-final-29aug19-en.pdf ccNSO2 Review - Assessment and Recommendations], August 29, 2019</ref> The recommendations were largely unchanged, although some were refined or clarified based on the Council's request to specify the responsible party.<ref name="finalrep" /> Meridian declined to provide a "top three" or otherwise prioritize the recommendations, noting that the RWP would have an opportunity to engage in a prioritization process in developing its Feasibility Assessment and Implementation Plan (FAIIP).<ref name="finalrep" />
Meridian's final report was published in August 2019<ref name="finalrep">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ccnso-review-assessment-recs-final-29aug19-en.pdf ccNSO2 Review - Assessment and Recommendations], August 29, 2019</ref> The recommendations were largely unchanged, although some were refined or clarified based on the Council's request to specify the responsible party. In addition, Recommendation 2 was split into two subparts, for a total of fifteen top-line recommendations.<ref name="finalrep" /> Meridian declined to provide a "top three" or otherwise prioritize the recommendations, noting that the RWP would have an opportunity to engage in a prioritization process in developing its Feasibility Assessment and Implementation Plan (FAIIP).<ref name="finalrep" />
==Implementation==
==Implementation==
===OEC Request for Clarification===
===OEC Request for Clarification===
In August 2020, the RWP met with the Organizational Effectiveness Committee to discuss the FAIIP document.<ref name="oeclttr">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/doria-to-sataki-09dec20-en.pdf Letter from Avri Doria to Katrina Sataki], December 9, 2020</ref> In December 2020, the OEC sent a letter to the ccNSO Council chair and the ccNSO2 RWP regarding the RWP's responses within the FAIIP.<ref name="dashboard" /><ref name="oeclttr" /> The letter requested follow-up information along three lines of inquiry:
# Verification that the RWP had accepted 13 of 15 underlying issues identified by Meridian, but had accepted only five of the fifteen recommendations. If this was correct: where the RWP has accepted the issue but not the recommendation, "what specific steps you are planning, or have already taken, to address the issue, and what incremental resources would be required (for ICANN org’s purposes);" where there are no plans to address an issue, the RWP's rationale for deciding not to act; and where recommendations were accepted for implementation, a status report on implementation.
# "[A]dditional information on how the ccNSO intends to proceed with the implementation for several recommendations that were accepted, such as high-level steps, as well as resource and timing indications. We also invite the Review Working Party to detail the reasoning behind recommendations directed at ICANN org to implement." This portion of the letter repeated the request for status updates on any in-progress implementation of recommendations.
# "Finally, the OEC would be appreciative if you would share and elaborate on the specifics regarding any ongoing activities that the ccNSO believes respond to the issues behind the rejected recommendations, and potential ways to address the issues reported as deferred until the next ccNSO review."<ref name="oeclttr" />
The RWP responded in February 2021 with a letter to the OEC.<ref name="feblttr">[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/sataki-to-doria-26feb21-en.pdf Letter from ccNSO Chair to OEC], February 26, 2021</ref> The letter outlined improvements that were responsive to the various issues identified by Meridian, as well as describing ongoing activities and rationales for inaction as requested in the OEC's letter. As of June 2021, there has been no response from the OEC, and the ccNSO2 dashboard states that the review is still in the implementation of improvements phase.<ref name="dashboard" />
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}