3,197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 70:
Line 70: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
The FAIIP rejected most of the specific recommendations from Meridian's final report, noting in most cases that the underlying issue was important, but that the recommendation in question was impractical, likely to fail based on prior experiences of the organization, or had been rendered moot by other developments (such as the amendment to the bylaws, or the adoption of parallel ccNSO improvements to process).<ref name="faiip" /> The RWP agreed with some recommendations, including revamping and standardization of managemennt of the ccNSO website and its resource archives, provision of transcription & translation resources, and prominent and centralized access to onboarding reference materials.<ref name="faiip" />
The FAIIP rejected most of the specific recommendations from Meridian's final report, noting in most cases that the underlying issue was important, but that the recommendation in question was impractical, likely to fail based on prior experiences of the organization, or had been rendered moot by other developments (such as the amendment to the bylaws, or the adoption of parallel ccNSO improvements to process).<ref name="faiip" /> The RWP agreed with some recommendations, including revamping and standardization of managemennt of the ccNSO website and its resource archives, provision of transcription & translation resources, and prominent and centralized access to onboarding reference materials.<ref name="faiip" />
===RWP Responses to Recommendations===
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! #
! Recommendation
! Accepted by RWP
! Response<br />
|-
| 1
| Communication materials re: value of ccNSO membership/participation
| Yes
| Recruitment of prospective representatives is worthwhile<br />
|-
| 2a
| Create a quota system for including newcomers in working groups
| No
| Recommendation is too limiting - agree in principle that increasing participation is worthwhile<br />
|-
| 2b
| Create & maintain a roster of people interested in volunteering
| No<br />
| Previous effort to do something similar failed
|-
| 3
| Standardize and clearly articulate process of appointing WG chairs
| No
| "Basic and common practice" exists<br />
|-
| 4
| Amend Bylaws re: IANA Naming Function appointees<br />
| No
| Moot - change has occurred
|-
| 5
| Councilor term limits + waiver option
| No
| In the view of the RWP the factors influencing availability [of candidates] need to be indentified first and taken into account in developing a solution.
|-
| 6
| Meeting format changes to allow more varied participation<br />
| No
| MPC has taken steps to improve and increase interaction already<br />
|-
| 7
| Invest in real-time scribing of meetings
| Yes
| "In the past, the ccNSO has requested several times for real time-scribing, however, to date it has been declined for changing reasons."
|-
| 8
| Translate ccNSO ICANN Learn course into multiple languages
| Yes
|
|-
| 9
| Improve and streamline mentorship program
| No<br />
| On-boarding a shared issue of concern, but the recommendation does not address the multiple factors involved
|-
| 10
| Centralize and prominently display web resources for newcomers
| Yes
|
|-
| 11
| Overhaul website ASAP
| Yes
| The ccNSO Council will send a letter to the Board stressing the urgency and importance of this recommendation and underlying findings
|-
| 12
| Standardize and offer training of uploading of resources/docs to website
| No
| Already done, also new website will make this better<br />
|-
| 13
| Council should adhere to Council Practices Guidelines, or else amend those guidelines to reflect sustainable and timely practices<br />
| No
| "The RWP does not agree with the wording used in the Report. To date experience has shown that the agenda and decision list are published in time."
|-
| 14
| Independent Examiner should have access to archived mailing lists
| Yes
| For verification purposes only
|}
===OEC Request for Clarification===
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}