Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | Acronym: '''T'''op '''L'''evel '''D'''omain
| + | The '''T'''op '''L'''evel '''D'''omain ('''TLD''') is always the last part of a domain name, such as [[.com]], [[.net]], [[.us]], etc.<ref>[http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=TLD&i=52942,00.asp TLD]</ref> Each TLD is managed by a single [[:Category:Registries|Registry]]. |
− | | |
− | The '''TLD''' is always the last part of a domain name, such as [[.com]], [[.net]], [[.us]], etc.<ref>[http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia_term/0,2542,t=TLD&i=52942,00.asp TLD]</ref> Each TLD is managed by a single [[:Category:Registries|Registry]].
| |
| | | |
| ==History== | | ==History== |
− | The need for a hierarchical [[DNS]] arose with the popularity of the Internet in academic spheres in the early 1980s; which eventually necessitated a de-centralized Internet. Communications between [[The Stanford Research Institute NIC]] and other institutions include plans to create a hierarchical [[DNS]], found in [http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc805.txt RFC 805], a group document from 1982. This document outlines many of the basics of the eventual [[DNS]], including the need for [[TLD]]s to provide a fixed starting point for queries, and the need for [[SLD]]s to be unique. This, in turn, would necessitate the need for a [[registrar]] type of administration, and help the nascent [[IT]] community recognize that the distribution of responsibility for each domain to individual name servers would provide administrative advantages.<ref>[http://www.livinginternet.com/i/iw_dns_history.htm Living Internet]</ref> | + | The need for a hierarchical [[DNS]] arose with the popularity of the Internet in academic spheres in the early 1980s, which eventually necessitated a de-centralized Internet. Communications between [[The Stanford Research Institute NIC]] and other institutions included plans to create a hierarchical [[DNS]], found in [http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc805.txt RFC 805], a group document from 1982. This document outlines many of the basics of the eventual [[DNS]], including the need for [[TLD]]s to provide a fixed starting point for queries, and the need for [[SLD]]s to be unique. This, in turn, would necessitate the need for a [[registrar]] type of administration, and help the nascent [[IT]] community recognize that the distribution of responsibility for each domain to individual name servers would provide administrative advantages.<ref>[http://www.livinginternet.com/i/iw_dns_history.htm Living Internet]</ref> |
| | | |
| ==Varieties of TLDs== | | ==Varieties of TLDs== |
Line 17: |
Line 15: |
| * Operating Mode | | * Operating Mode |
| **Open - Operating and offering both registration and resolution services. | | **Open - Operating and offering both registration and resolution services. |
− | **Closed - Not Accepting registrations, may be resolving evergreen/legacy/infrastructure subdomains. | + | **Closed - Not accepting registrations, may be resolving evergreen/legacy/infrastructure subdomains. |
| * Level of Restriction | | * Level of Restriction |
| **Unrestricted - If there are no requirements that must be met in order to register a name under a TLD, that TLD is Unrestricted. | | **Unrestricted - If there are no requirements that must be met in order to register a name under a TLD, that TLD is Unrestricted. |