Bureaucrats, steward, Administrators, translator
867
edits
Changes
mLine 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Christiane moved page User:Markwd/Interviews to User:MarkWD/Interviews: Automatically moved page while renaming the user "Markwd" to "MarkWD"
=Batch 2=
== Anand Vora ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYarcEL18Ao
'''Subject''': What does a registry do?
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,840
So I like giving this example... so I do partnerships to strategic partnerships.
2
00:00:07,840 --> 00:00:16,040
So when you're trying to explain what a [[registry]] is to say a nonprofit organization or an association,
3
00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:22,000
what I say is think of us as the manufacturer of Coca-Cola.
4
00:00:22,000 --> 00:00:27,200
If you want to buy a kind of Coke, Coca-Cola doesn't have stores, right?
5
00:00:27,200 --> 00:00:31,800
You have to go to Walmart, Safeway, 7-Eleven.
6
00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:32,960
We're similar.
7
00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:39,640
We manufacture [[.org]] domains, but you can't buy from us.
8
00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:46,480
We sell them through partners like [[GoDadd]]y, [[Namecheap]], Spockbuns of the world.
9
00:00:46,480 --> 00:00:51,640
So our customers are the [[registrar]]s and the [[reseller]]s.
10
00:00:51,640 --> 00:00:56,600
Our users are the end users: nonprofit organizations, mission driven organizations,
11
00:00:56,600 --> 00:00:58,560
individual's profit with a purpose.
12
00:00:58,560 --> 00:01:05,880
So in that sense, that's the uniqueness of, we sit here, but then we work across.
13
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:11,240
We are one or two steps removed from the end user, but that's why it becomes a pretty tight knit community
14
00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:13,720
of working with partners, working with the channel.
== Bibek Silwal ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtVocIry1u8
'''Subject''': Universal Acceptance in India
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,000
'''Jessica Rivers''': Where do you think [[Universal Acceptance]] adoption is happening most successfully?
2
00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:12,720
'''Bibek Silwal''': Well, we do have really good examples, specifically in India. So the program I organized, I presented a
3
00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:19,920
case study. And so it's not just about the language, it's about the primary and secondary effects it
4
00:00:19,920 --> 00:00:27,360
has in all of the ecosystem, including the enhancements of socioeconomics or the creation of jobs,
5
00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:32,640
ownership of the content on the Internet and a lot of things. So, you know, as of now, people are not
6
00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:37,520
taking it very seriously, specifically the technical people, but, you know, in the coming three or four
7
00:00:37,520 --> 00:00:43,840
years with this effort in the ICANN community, I think, you know, the Universal Acceptance rate
8
00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,320
would be higher in applications and websites.
== Brian King ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q79db4kL2YM
'''Subject''': Why WHOIS access is still an issue in 2023.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:04,340
I think the biggest problem that ICANN needs to solve now,
2
00:00:04,340 --> 00:00:06,780
and has been the biggest problem they've needed to solve
3
00:00:06,780 --> 00:00:11,780
for the last five years and one month or so, is [[WHOIS]];
4
00:00:13,260 --> 00:00:16,020
or you can hear it called "registration data".
5
00:00:16,020 --> 00:00:20,760
We worked... I representative [[IPC]] constituency on the [[Expedited Policy Development Process on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data|EPDP]],
6
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:24,160
which worked for three or four years straight
7
00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:28,900
on trying to solve the issue of how to access WHOIS data,
8
00:00:28,900 --> 00:00:33,500
how to collect, store, process, and then disclose
9
00:00:33,500 --> 00:00:37,820
WHOIS data to IP (intellectual property) owners, law enforcement,
10
00:00:37,820 --> 00:00:42,740
in a way that respected, I might say,
11
00:00:42,740 --> 00:00:45,300
didn't violate, the rights of the data subjects
12
00:00:45,300 --> 00:00:47,060
or the domain name registrants,
13
00:00:47,060 --> 00:00:50,180
but really that respected those rights
14
00:00:50,180 --> 00:00:52,980
and ensured that those rights were maintained.
15
00:00:52,980 --> 00:00:56,540
And it didn't go well, I'll be candid with you.
16
00:00:56,540 --> 00:00:58,700
It was hard work.
17
00:00:58,700 --> 00:01:00,060
There were a lot of interests
18
00:01:00,060 --> 00:01:03,580
that were working across purposes in the EPDP.
19
00:01:03,580 --> 00:01:07,540
And I regret, maybe I even lament the fact
20
00:01:07,540 --> 00:01:10,100
that we didn't get it done.
21
00:01:10,100 --> 00:01:14,100
And now the work kind of sits with ICANN,
22
00:01:15,220 --> 00:01:20,220
the organization and the Board to do some things.
23
00:01:20,340 --> 00:01:22,580
They're doing some studies and some pilot programs
24
00:01:22,580 --> 00:01:26,180
to try to get more information about possible ways
25
00:01:26,180 --> 00:01:28,580
that it could work going forward.
26
00:01:28,580 --> 00:01:32,460
So yes, the EPDP group that I was a part of
27
00:01:32,460 --> 00:01:35,700
passed some policy recommendations.
28
00:01:35,700 --> 00:01:38,500
Most of them, at least about half of them
29
00:01:38,500 --> 00:01:40,300
didn't have consensus within the groups.
30
00:01:40,300 --> 00:01:43,820
I don't know how they got sent to the ICANN Board,
31
00:01:43,820 --> 00:01:45,620
but the Board doesn't know what to do
32
00:01:45,620 --> 00:01:47,100
with those recommendations.
33
00:01:47,100 --> 00:01:52,100,
So they came up with this system as kind of a "skin",
34
00:01:52,340 --> 00:01:56,540
in like the software technology sense of a platform,
35
00:01:56,540 --> 00:01:59,780
that they want to try out and see if it works,
36
00:02:00,940 --> 00:02:04,260
a voluntary kind of request of data
37
00:02:04,260 --> 00:02:06,060
and let the registrar figure out
38
00:02:06,060 --> 00:02:08,220
if they're going to provide the data within the system
39
00:02:08,220 --> 00:02:09,820
kind of framework.
40
00:02:09,820 --> 00:02:12,340
But in my opinion, if that's going to work,
41
00:02:12,340 --> 00:02:15,700
it needs a lot more policy requirements around it
42
00:02:15,700 --> 00:02:19,620
and safeguards and things that it doesn't have.
43
00:02:19,620 --> 00:02:21,700
So we're going to encourage people to use it.
44
00:02:21,700 --> 00:02:24,980
It's good, I'm glad that ICANN's doing something,
45
00:02:25,060 --> 00:02:27,060
trying this as a pilot.
46
00:02:27,060 --> 00:02:30,100
My concern is that we don't know what data
47
00:02:30,100 --> 00:02:33,500
it's going to generate or how the Board's going to
48
00:02:34,900 --> 00:02:37,500
take that data; how that data is going to inform
49
00:02:37,500 --> 00:02:39,660
what the Board decides to do.
50
00:02:39,660 --> 00:02:43,900
So I'm a little skeptical about: if it's a success,
51
00:02:43,900 --> 00:02:47,100
then we don't get to go come up with a policy
52
00:02:47,100 --> 00:02:49,420
that is better.
53
00:02:49,420 --> 00:02:52,420
And if it fails, my concern is that,
54
00:02:52,460 --> 00:02:54,060
well, they're going to say:
55
00:02:54,060 --> 00:02:56,580
this type of system isn't going to be successful,
56
00:02:56,580 --> 00:02:58,060
so let's not build one.
== Claire Craig ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og6bYz5V488
'''Subject''': The need for IXPs in the Caribbean.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:16,000
So for us in the Caribbean particularly, we have a different model because if you look at the US, it's a commercial model for them because it is a large nation and there are lots of people.
2
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:32,000
But we have small nations and [[Internet service providers]] are very competitive, and because we have small nations, most of our Internet providers transfer their data through Miami.
3
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:47,000
So it means that for a small country, let's say like Trinidad and Tobago, if you are in Trinidad with me and I am talking to you, my data has to go to Miami to be transferred to you.
4
00:00:47,000 --> 00:01:10,000
That becomes a very expensive proposition. So what I'm trying to do is really convince governments and other stakeholders of the importance of collaborating and having an [[Internet Exchange Point]] in the country because if you transit via the Internet Exchange Point, it's [[peering]] and it's settlement free data.
5
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:25,000
So the exciting thing about it is that you're really doing things for the end users and for the citizens and residents of the country and lowering the cost of doing business on the Internet. So that's it in a nutshell.
== David Morar ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLDTUMfuWBM
'''Subject''': Internet legislation in the U.S. vs. in the EU.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:13,000
The potential biggest reason for that is that I think in the US, a lot of folks are more geared towards a status quo perspective in terms of legislation, right, like: "let's not. Let's kind of keep government out of it".
2
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:16,000
"And we can deal with it or whatever."
3
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:35,000
And also more of an entrepreneurial slash corporatist view of things, whereas in the EU, you know, historically, most of those countries have had strong governments or have had a perspective that said, well, you know, these things should be regulated.
4
00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:42,000
And that's one. The second reason is that in the EU, it's much easier to put up legislation.
5
00:00:42,000 --> 00:01:03,000
It's much easier to pass it. It's complicated, it's long, it's very sort of like admin-heavy, it's very bureaucratic... but there's a path for it. And you know, politics are involved, obviously, but it's a lot more a thing of process, whereas in the United States, process is important, but it's all politics.
== Emily Taylor ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hZwqOSzods
'''Subject''': The role of the DNS in combating fraud.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,440
it's understandable that, say, the DNS industry wants to draw bright lines around like:
2
00:00:07,440 --> 00:00:14,000
we don't do this, we do do that. In reality, the experiences are much more mushy.
3
00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:21,600
And so the DNS will be the carrier for a lot of things that you could argue are content-related
4
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:27,920
issues. But actually... we're doing some research on, you know, why consumers fall for link-based
5
00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:33,360
scams. And actually, the domain name plays a big part in that, you know, because it's part of when
6
00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:39,040
you're looking for what we call... you're in a hurry, you're living your life. There's this
7
00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:44,880
sort of concept of selective scrutiny that you're sort of just looking for clues, you don't
8
00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:50,720
want to get into it. But you're looking for clues about whether something's legit, and actually
9
00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:58,320
names are really important in doing that. And so yes, although the domain name itself might be quite
10
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:05,520
innocent, it might be happening at different levels, or that the whole thing might be happening at a
11
00:01:05,520 --> 00:01:13,360
hosting level, at the application layer... actually, the domain name is involved. It doesn't mean that
12
00:01:13,360 --> 00:01:19,680
it's the complete solution, but I feel like the cutting off is useful to a certain extent... but
13
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:25,200
if it's cutting you off from the policy conversation, then you're going to end up with really stupid
14
00:01:25,200 --> 00:01:30,800
policy answers that don't understand, and you don't get the chance to engage in those policy
15
00:01:30,800 --> 00:01:38,880
solutions, it gets very sledgehammer type of thing. So obviously it's a comforting narrative for those
16
00:01:38,880 --> 00:01:45,520
within ICANN, but the risk of it is that the conversation just goes around you. And you're
17
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:51,120
not involved in it, because you're just, you're actually like, you're King Canute in the waves,
18
00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:58,640
commanding the waves to go back. And actually, you've developed this way of thinking and talking
19
00:01:58,640 --> 00:02:04,480
to each other, which makes perfect sense to each other, and we all agree. But actually, nobody,
20
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:11,360
if you took a consumer into that environment, they'd be like: "what's wrong with you?" So it
21
00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:17,520
doesn't make... it is completely disconnected from the consumer's experience, and I think that's
22
00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:24,000
a problem. And it's actually a problem for the ICANN process, as much as the situation itself.
23
00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:31,840
Because actually, a lot of other, government-led, organizations are really keen to take up the
24
00:02:31,840 --> 00:02:33,920
slack.
== Emmanuel Vitus ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8X5YjxRTkrw
'''Subject''': Non-commercial participation in ICANN.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,000
But when you take the [[Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group]],
2
00:00:05,600 --> 00:00:08,240
now most of them are volunteers,
3
00:00:08,240 --> 00:00:10,000
not like the [[BC]] or the [[GAC]],
4
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:14,800
where people are actually doing that as their daily job.
5
00:00:14,800 --> 00:00:17,320
And I mean, their job that pay their bills
6
00:00:17,320 --> 00:00:18,520
and those kind of things.
7
00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,480
So they actually put much more effort into it.
8
00:00:22,480 --> 00:00:23,920
And they have the resources,
9
00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:25,920
like the business community has the resources,
10
00:00:25,920 --> 00:00:28,840
people are the lawyers for their organizations
11
00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:29,680
and those kind of things.
12
00:00:29,680 --> 00:00:32,600
So they represent an interest
13
00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:35,360
that actually really matches their profession as well.
14
00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:37,960
So it's much easier for them.
15
00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:41,120
But if you take the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group,
16
00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:44,840
usually people are volunteers and there is volunteer fatigue,
17
00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:46,720
especially during the COVID,
18
00:00:46,720 --> 00:00:51,360
we felt this because spending hours in meetings...
19
00:00:51,360 --> 00:00:53,840
let me give a basic example:
20
00:00:53,840 --> 00:00:57,560
Like, today, I finished the [[EPDP_on_Internationalized_Domain_Names|IDN]] meeting... before I was sleeping,
21
00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:00,240
for most of the meeting before the call came in,
22
00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:03,560
but that call was 90 minutes call.
23
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:05,640
And that call I've been actually following
24
00:01:05,640 --> 00:01:10,160
that EPDP for a year and two months now.
25
00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:14,000
So every week I have to spend at least that 90 minutes...
26
00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:16,520
before you later digest everything,
27
00:01:16,520 --> 00:01:18,280
and get back to your stakeholder group.
28
00:01:18,280 --> 00:01:23,280
So, well, if you don't have that interest in the topic
29
00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:27,480
or you don't have that volunteerism,
30
00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:31,880
I mean, you cannot,
31
00:01:31,880 --> 00:01:34,680
let's be honest, if somebody is doing a daily job
32
00:01:34,680 --> 00:01:37,520
that pays his bills, he will not take 90 minutes,
33
00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:39,680
with, I mean, in the middle of the week,
34
00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:45,080
supports his work and work on, I mean, an EPDP
35
00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:46,440
and those kind of things.
36
00:01:46,440 --> 00:01:49,560
At the beginning, due to the huge number of volunteers,
37
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:54,160
it was easy, but with COVID because during those days,
38
00:01:54,160 --> 00:01:59,000
let's say for example, the travel support was one of those..
39
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:02,320
how do you call it? Elements that stimulates people
40
00:02:02,320 --> 00:02:07,320
to say that: "oh, okay, at least it's like a gratitude
41
00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:11,120
to you for what you have been doing and those kind of things".
42
00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:15,080
But with COVID, I mean, the whole life has really,
43
00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:18,800
really changed, is only now that a lot of people
44
00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:24,880
are coming back, because, I don't know for the other groups,
45
00:02:24,880 --> 00:02:27,400
but for the, how do you call it?
46
00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:31,560
Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group,
47
00:02:31,560 --> 00:02:34,960
what we do have is the [[CROP]], which is a travel support
48
00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:39,480
that we use to allow community members who have been active.
49
00:02:39,480 --> 00:02:41,320
Maybe they are not at the leadership position,
50
00:02:41,320 --> 00:02:45,240
but they have been active into this whole policy work
51
00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:46,800
or the whole ICANN meeting,
52
00:02:46,800 --> 00:02:50,360
we try it as much as possible to bring them
53
00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:53,120
to the meeting at least once in a year and those kind of things.
54
00:02:53,120 --> 00:02:55,600
So it's kind of a recognition that we do,
55
00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:59,720
that's the only recognition at the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group.
== Lauren Tussey ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmeIW3pKGT0
'''Subject''': Second round of new gTLDs; and fraud online.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:15,000
Yeah, I mean, I'm obviously interested in the next round and, and following that quite closely. When that came out, you know, in 2000... what was it, 14, I was like the part of all of that and it was a huge, huge part of my job.
2
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:20,000
So I'm interested to see how that pans out and what happens in the next round.
3
00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:36,000
You know, I'm kind of disappointed on the timeframe, like the timeline. I think everyone is, you know, we've done this before, it's been over 10 years, or almost 10 years, and it'll be almost 12 years, you know, when they expect to have it come out, and that's a long time.
4
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:42,000
And I'm interested to understand, you know, what we're going to expect as far as the applications that are going to come in.
5
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:59,000
I've seen all the brands that have applied last time, and none of them were successful. I don't think any brand that had their TLD has successfully used it... we've keep seeing brands that are letting them drop, you know, they don't want, they
6
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:05,000
don't want to continue with their application or they're they're letting the TLD drop... so I'm interested to know:
7
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:12,000
are, are we going to see more brands? A lot of brands 10 years ago didn't even know that it was an option.
8
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:22,000
And so are we going to see an influx of these. And then also with this [[Web3]] stuff, you know, like how does that impact the applications and what can be submitted?
9
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:25,000
I think ICANN has been very...
10
00:01:25,000 --> 00:01:35,000
It's been very blurry as far as what if they're going to allow the same applications for the for names that have already been registered in Web3 domain names.
11
00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:40,000
There's like what about this conflict and this between that.
12
00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:57,000
The other thing, you know, that I'm interested in is fraud. I know that sounds weird, but as [[registrars]], I've seen an uptick in fraud and it's something that I try to talk about with other registrars and they all seem to have the same problems as we do,
13
00:01:57,000 --> 00:02:12,000
you know, fraud is, is getting worse we're seeing more account takeovers, we're seeing some issues with, you know, testing cards and things like that. And I would love to be able to talk more with different registrars and see like how can we come up with a better
14
00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:19,000
solution that we can all, you know, how can we maybe exchange ideas and what's working what's not.
15
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:33,000
I don't think that we're the only ones that are having these issues so usually it comes they come together right somebody purchases a domain name uses stolen credit card and then they use that domain name to do abusive things.
16
00:02:33,000 --> 00:02:47,000
And then, you know, eventually, the charge is disputed, the domain gets suspended, and it's a lot of time and resources and money, you know, and it's very...
17
00:02:47,000 --> 00:03:02,000
It's increasing in the industry. And we've also seen an increase in account takeovers where somehow somebody got someone's username and password somewhere else and then they start testing it on different registrars websites and they see if they can get into these
18
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:07,000
accounts and then they start making purchases and things like that that are all fraudulent.
19
00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:17,000
So, that's what I mean with fraud, not necessarily just like abuse, but, you know, fraudulent charges, I guess.
== Mariana Marinho ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1hLWCAv3nU
'''Subject''': [[Coalition for Digital Africa]].
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,400
I think it's important to know that this is not a project... it's not an ICANN only initiative,
2
00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:15,360
you know, it's really like bringing together partners to advance the internet and expand
3
00:00:15,360 --> 00:00:22,720
the internet in Africa. So we were just like, each project, you know, we have different
4
00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:28,480
stakeholders involved and different partners and I think that's what
5
00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:36,400
is exciting about it, you know, because like, our impact is much greater than ICANN's only impact,
6
00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:44,560
and really like, for us as a group really trying to move the needle, you know, and
7
00:00:45,520 --> 00:00:52,800
make a positive impact... but like, I think this program, also this... like the coalition work
8
00:00:52,800 --> 00:01:00,560
has always also the way I see, it being in a different way of approaching projects in ICANN
9
00:01:00,560 --> 00:01:05,280
and we're working much more collaborative within like our different functions, you know,
10
00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:11,760
because everything that we do it's not only like projects that would be, oh, our
11
00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:23,040
engineering and information technology team is putting ICANN, it's like putting the
12
00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:34,800
infrastructure somewhere and it's like it usually like involves the
13
00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:40,240
African engagement team or the Middle Eastern engagement team and like now we're also
14
00:01:40,240 --> 00:01:47,840
working like with Comms and like bringing other people to really raise the profile, you know, and
15
00:01:48,880 --> 00:01:56,640
and like make sure that that initiative is disseminating in a different way that it's like
16
00:01:56,640 --> 00:02:05,520
beyond the ICANN regular communication channels... but like, for now, this is like the first
17
00:02:06,160 --> 00:02:13,840
coalition of this kind that ICANN is really leading, you know, like leading in a way that
18
00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:19,760
is like putting the seed money, it's the seed resources that we're like, okay, we think we see
19
00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:25,280
a void here, you know, it's like we see that it's opportunity for coordination and collaboration
20
00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:37,200
within this sphere, let's like put together a secretariat, you know, and resources and like work
21
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:42,480
with our stakeholders to see what we can accomplish... and we are going to be doing that for
22
00:02:42,480 --> 00:02:47,360
the next like two years and that's a point also to reassess, it's like: "is everyone else
23
00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:54,960
seeing value on this?", you know, it's like and if it is, let's continue to work with partners on that
24
00:02:54,960 --> 00:03:00,320
but it's not the idea that this is something that ICANN will do regardless of the outcome,
25
00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:04,880
you know, we really need to see our partners coming on board and
26
00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:13,840
expanding and we hope to be. We're going to be exploring if it makes sense to expand this
27
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:17,840
for to other regiments as well.
== Natalia Filina ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mc0pN-YTs78
'''Subject''': On being the [[EURALO]]'s secretary.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,000
As Secretary, so I'm helping a Chair of [[EURALO]], it's the European ICANN region.
2
00:00:07,000 --> 00:00:15,000
We are caring about bringing an interest of end users to policy development persons of ICANN.
3
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:27,000
And we are caring about connections with some organizations and individual members in European region.
4
00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:31,000
So we try to gather information about activities.
5
00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:36,000
We are asking about feedback and input for policy questions.
6
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:45,000
And we do a lot of outreach engagement work, many, many capacity building work, etc.
7
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:50,000
I try to help, don't disturb my EURALO chair.
8
00:00:50,000 --> 00:00:58,000
And I help build this very difficult construction of our relationship.
== Olof Nordling ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lLFElrSSL4
'''Subject''': Progression of the [[GAC]]'s performance over ICANN's history.
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:11,000
They were all the same, but I think that what happened during the years was that we were seriously understaffed at the very beginning.
2
00:00:11,000 --> 00:00:15,000
So those were the hectic, hectic, hectic meetings.
3
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:25,000
Doesn't mean they weren't fun, but it was stretching it, and a lot of running around and a lot of...
4
00:00:26,000 --> 00:00:38,000
Well, we got told off as a group and as individuals by the community for not being able to cope.
5
00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:46,000
And of course that was addressed, which makes it so that at the end of the final years [of Olaf's participation],
6
00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:59,000
that I attended too, there was a lot smoother sailing, if I can say so, and a lot of better understanding
7
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:05,000
because there was more time to share and have discussions with others
8
00:01:05,000 --> 00:01:15,000
without having to run to and fro between various meetings which you couldn't follow really in the proper way as it was in the very beginning.
== Phillip Marano ==
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbXijlKDmOA
'''Subject''': Importance of the [[UDRP]].
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,000
When people ask me because like, you know, after 10 years or so, you tend to get a little jaded and people are like, well, how do you still go?
2
00:00:06,000 --> 00:00:16,000
And my consistent answer is to basically protect the [[UDRP]]. It's the uniform domain name dispute resolution policy.
3
00:00:16,000 --> 00:00:28,000
I use it in my day to day job to take down abusive domain names and I'm a panelist at the World Intellectual Property Organization, so I help decide those disputes.
4
00:00:28,000 --> 00:00:36,000
And there's, you know, really not that many of us left. I feel like if we were all to just pack it in and say, oh, we're not getting anything done here.
5
00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:49,000
That policy would very quickly suffer and then, you know, it's currently one of the most effective tools we have and for that to go away would be a real shame so stick around to help protect that.
6
00:00:49,000 --> 00:01:04,000
I was going to say recently, but it was several years ago at this point where it was opened up for a policy review and you had positions, very extreme positions in that working group that basically said, we don't need this anymore.
7
00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:13,000
I mean, most reasonable people said, yeah, it's working well, like we shouldn't change a lot, blah, blah, blah, but there were a few that said, yeah, we hate this thing, let's get rid of it.
8
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:19,000
So you need to counterbalance, you need to be present to counterbalance voices like that.
=Batch 1=
== Amr Elsadr ==
== Amr Elsadr ==